NODE 53a6e9f2Re: TLAs on cypherpnks (was R
"Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>Wed, 31 Jul 1996 08:01:01 +0800
A story I heard: During a privacy conference back when Clipper was
first proposed (about 3 yrs ago) people were questioning an NSA rep
about escrow. He started off his rebuttal by asking "Is Sternlight
here?" and then contined his reasoning as to why Clipper was a good
thing.
Don't know if this actually happened, but I'm sure if it did some
here would remember it.
--Rob
On 30 Jul 96 at 5:35, pjn@nworks.com wrote:
> In> Is this the first confirmed report of TLA cypherpunk-monitoring?
>
> Might be the first reported, but many people probably thought it was...
> I did...
---
No-frills sig.
Befriend my mail filter by sending a message with the subject "send help"
Key-ID: 5D3F2E99 1996/04/22 wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (root@magneto)
AB1F4831 1993/05/10 Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Send a message with the subject "send pgp-key" for a copy of my key.
NODE 1c5364d9Re: TLAs on cypherpnks (was R
Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>Wed, 31 Jul 1996 09:22:15 +0800
"Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com> writes:
>A story I heard: During a privacy conference back when Clipper was
>first proposed (about 3 yrs ago) people were questioning an NSA rep
>about escrow. He started off his rebuttal by asking "Is Sternlight
>here?" and then contined his reasoning as to why Clipper was a good
>thing.
>Don't know if this actually happened, but I'm sure if it did some
>here would remember it.
It happened, but that's about sci.crypt or talk.politics.crypto rather
than Cypherpunks, since David wasn't vocal here in those days. A sci.crypt
article on CFP '94 by Jerod Tufte dated 26 Mar 94 included the transcript
of a panel discussion involving (among others) Stewart Baker, then NSA
general counsel; the panel was on 24 Mar. Mike Godwin asked from the floor:
You said in myth number four that we can anticipate -- and in fact NSA
did anticipate that these technologies would become available in five
to ten years. People would go buy telephones, have an encryption
button and be able to use this technology -- I think I am quoting you
accurately -- in profoundly anti-social ways. Isn't it true that many
otherwise acceptable technologies can be used by individuals in
profoundly anti-social ways including, say the printing press. Isn't
it in fact true that in a democratic society we make a decision to
empower individuals knowing upfront and openly that we do so taking
risk about society. Isn't that in fact the case in this country?
Baker responded:
Yes. And first I should say, Mike, I haven't met you but I've read
your stuff and actually, is David Sternlight here too?
Sure you take risks and you have to look at each technology as it
comes. Let's take a look at cars. Cars have advantages and risks and
how do we deal with that. We put license plates on every car and
everybody has to have a license plate on their car even if they think
it violates their First Amendment Rights to do it.