NODE 06331c88Re: Lack of PGP signatures
frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)Thu, 4 Jul 1996 07:14:08 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 7:38 AM 7/3/96 +0000, Brad Shantz wrote:
>PGP is a pain for encrypting or signing e-mail when you have to save
>your message out to a temp file, encrypt it, and load it back in to
>your mail package.
On my Mac I just entered this answer, cut it to the clipboard, launched
PGP, clearsigned it, and pasted the result back into the Eudora window for
the new mail.
Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQB1AwUBMdqyT9QgMXPCzT+1AQF35QMAiUM/5pVLwh41m0KncAiW+kms0d/GWn2W
C8RNwQpzanwEBaNyCpd/MSPdMAz5+YRrstnmp9MqGwbKMbsW4frqb86Dxdpgp2/f
qnwHvik9PlU/K81unAPij83MulSuysdJ
=feiY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The Internet may fairly be | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | regarded as a never-ending | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | worldwide conversation. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
NODE e01d93ebRe: Lack of PGP signatures
Charles Watt <watt@sware.com>Thu, 4 Jul 1996 08:05:39 +0800
-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 4,MIC-CLEAR
Content-Domain: RFC822
Originator-Certificate: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MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
BeMb0/+U7Gnp8Xx2J5GUFwFI2hLb0giw65Y+HudXPvuSMDdeBToKOQXkR/HvyvKr
kM+gtqWFV3Q/2xKS6iIeYRc=
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> At 7:38 AM 7/3/96 +0000, Brad Shantz wrote:
> >PGP is a pain for encrypting or signing e-mail when you have to save
> >your message out to a temp file, encrypt it, and load it back in to
> >your mail package.
>
> On my Mac I just entered this answer, cut it to the clipboard, launched
> PGP, clearsigned it, and pasted the result back into the Eudora window for
> the new mail.
>
> Bill
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6
>
> iQB1AwUBMdqyT9QgMXPCzT+1AQF35QMAiUM/5pVLwh41m0KncAiW+kms0d/GWn2W
> C8RNwQpzanwEBaNyCpd/MSPdMAz5+YRrstnmp9MqGwbKMbsW4frqb86Dxdpgp2/f
> qnwHvik9PlU/K81unAPij83MulSuysdJ
> =feiY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
With our mailers, you simply hit the reply key. Of course, it is PEM
rather than PGP. But with automated key management PEM can be a lot easier
to use than PGP with its key ring -- and most implementations don't require
you to use the restrictive IETF certificiate hierarchy. See
www.secureware.com
Charlie Watt
SecureWare, Inc.
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
NODE b9028905Re: Lack of PGP signatures
Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>Thu, 4 Jul 1996 11:20:22 +0800
On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, Charles Watt wrote:
> -----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
> Proc-Type: 4,MIC-CLEAR
> Content-Domain: RFC822
> Originator-Certificate:
> MIIBvzCCAWkCEFmOln6ip0w49CuyWr9vDVUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQAwWTELMAkG
> A1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD1NlY3VyZVdhcmUgSW5jLjEXMBUGA1UECxMOU2Vj
> dXJlV2FyZSBQQ0ExFzAVBgNVBAsTDkVuZ2luZWVyaW5nIENBMB4XDTk1MDUwODIw
> MjMzNVoXDTk3MDUwNzIwMjMzNVowcDELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD1Nl
> Y3VyZVdhcmUgSW5jLjEXMBUGA1UECxMOU2VjdXJlV2FyZSBQQ0ExFzAVBgNVBAsT
> DkVuZ2luZWVyaW5nIENBMRUwEwYDVQQDEwxDaGFybGVzIFdhdHQwWTAKBgRVCAEB
> AgICBANLADBIAkEM2ZSp7b6eqDqK5RbPFpd6DGSLjbpHOZU07pUcdgJXiduj9Ytf
> 1rsmf/adaplQr+X5FeoIdT/bVSv2MUi3gY0eFwIDAQABMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUA
> A0EApEjzeBjiSnGImJXgeY1K8HWSufpJ2DpLBF7DYqqIVAX9H7gmfOJhfeGEYVjK
> aTxjgASxqHhzkx7PkOnL4JrN+Q==
> MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
> BeMb0/+U7Gnp8Xx2J5GUFwFI2hLb0giw65Y+HudXPvuSMDdeBToKOQXkR/HvyvKr
> kM+gtqWFV3Q/2xKS6iIeYRc=
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
And then there's the part about it being ugly as sin for people with
non-crypto-aware clients, and a performance hit for people with clients that
are crypto-aware.
-rich
NODE d0d0bbc5Re: Lack of PGP signatures
Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>Thu, 4 Jul 1996 14:12:36 +0800
>>>>> "Rich" == Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu> writes:
Rich> On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, Charles Watt wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Rich> And then there's the part about it being ugly as sin ...
(defun gnus-article-hide-pem (&optional arg)
"Toggle hiding of any PEM headers and signatures in the current article.
If given a negative prefix, always show; if given a positive prefix,
always hide. Adapted from gnus-article-hide-pgp."
(interactive (gnus-hidden-arg))
(unless (gnus-article-check-hidden-text 'pem arg)
(save-excursion
(set-buffer gnus-article-buffer)
(let ((props (nconc (list 'gnus-type 'pem) gnus-hidden-properties))
buffer-read-only end)
(widen)
(goto-char (point-min))
;; hide the horrendously ugly "header".
(and (search-forward "\n-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----\n"
nil
t)
(setq end (1+ (match-beginning 0)))
(gnus-hide-text
end
(if (search-forward "\n\n" nil t)
(match-end 0)
(point-max))
props))
;; hide the trailer as well
(and (search-forward "\n-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----\n"
nil
t)
(gnus-hide-text (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0) props))))))
--
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour.
Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone
except you in November.