// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE b3e21e44Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11
At  1:34 PM 8/19/96 -0700, Mike Duvos wrote:
>Permit me to go off in an orthogonal direction here and say that
>I think that we should do away with the concept of a pre-ordained
>newsgroups in Usenet entirely, in favor of an IRC-like dynamic 
>creation of message pools.

Moderated newsgroups gain reputation from their moderation policies and
probably should not be included in this scheme.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | Cave ab homine unius lebri | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     |  [Beware the man of one    | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com |   book]  - Anonymous Latin | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
NODE 04312068Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11
ON
> 
> At  1:34 PM 8/19/96 -0700, Mike Duvos wrote:
> >Permit me to go off in an orthogonal direction here and say that
> >I think that we should do away with the concept of a pre-ordained
> >newsgroups in Usenet entirely, in favor of an IRC-like dynamic 
> >creation of message pools.
> 
> Moderated newsgroups gain reputation from their moderation policies and
> probably should not be included in this scheme.

Moderated newsgroups have very few posts because hardly anyone reads 
them.  I second the above propsed IRC-like scheme if it only would apply 
to moderated groups, because of IRC's bad reputation of moderation.