NODE 6e6b1709Re: Internal Passports
Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>Mon, 5 Aug 1996 08:52:41 +0800
At 10:02 AM 8/1/96 -0700, tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) wrote:
>Question (a la "Wired"): "When will the United States introduce an internal
>passport?"
>May: "2005, but they won't call it that."
Stewart: "Last week, but they didn't call it that."
According to Alaska Airlines, the FAA's policy as of last week
has switched to a mandatory policy that if you don't produce
government-issued photo-id, you can't get on the plane;
the previous policy had been more flexible.
The folks stamped my ticket "Documents Verified" - looks
suspiciously similar to "Papers In Order".
(Which they actually weren't, on my return trip;
I handed her my work ID in the same plastic carrier
as my train pass, and handed her the credit card
I'd bought the tickets with explaining that I wasn't
on government business and asking when had
the policy changed and commenting. And the nice
Rent-A-Xray-Technician who asked if I minded if
he searched my computer bag was totally confused
when I said "Yes, of course I mind.")
You can still travel in a car if someone else is driving,
and you can still get on a train without identification,
but without papers you can't fly or drive, and you can't
ride a horse on the freeway except in the back of a horse trailer.
Driver's licenses were the beginning of a long downhill trend.
I wonder if they'll still accept an American passport; the country
has obviously been taken over by Pod People while we weren't looking....
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs"> Defuse Authority!
NODE 9013d881Re: Internal Passports
Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>Tue, 6 Aug 1996 04:29:25 +0800
On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Bill Stewart wrote:
[...]
> You can still travel in a car if someone else is driving,
> and you can still get on a train without identification,
> but without papers you can't fly or drive, and you can't
> ride a horse on the freeway except in the back of a horse trailer.
> Driver's licenses were the beginning of a long downhill trend.
>
> I wonder if they'll still accept an American passport; the country
> has obviously been taken over by Pod People while we weren't looking....
I often have trouble with foreign passports and one of my associates often
has extensive problems trying to use an american passport for anything in
the United States.
Comments uttered in my presence on the subject have included:
"We don't accept THOSE."
"Sorry, we need to see OFFICIAL identification."
"Don't you have something state issued?"
"Uh, we need a driver's license number."
> # Thanks; Bill
> # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
> # <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs"> Defuse Authority!
>
>
--
I hate lightning - finger for public key - Vote Monarchist
unicorn@schloss.li
NODE 3bfb0b96Re: Internal Passports
Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>Tue, 6 Aug 1996 08:03:34 +0800
I've been using by british passport as photo-id for years, and I haven't
had any major problems- you can get your checks printed with your
passport number on them instead of a drivers licence, which will makes
things much easier.
Simon
---
Cause maybe (maybe) | In my mind I'm going to Carolina
you're gonna be the one that saves me | - back in Chapel Hill May 16th.
And after all | Email address remains unchanged
You're my firewall - | ........First in Usenet.........
NODE ac523d2eRe: Internal Passports
Christopher Blizzard <blizzard@odin.nyser.net>Wed, 7 Aug 1996 22:59:18 +0800
In message <Pine.SUN.3.91.960805162736.4762C-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>, Simon
Spero writes:
:I've been using by british passport as photo-id for years, and I haven't
:had any major problems- you can get your checks printed with your
:passport number on them instead of a drivers licence, which will makes
:things much easier.
:
There are a lot of retail stores that will complain if you don't use a
driver's license when paying with checks. Most check collection agencys
track people by that number.
--Chris
:Simon
:
:---
:Cause maybe (maybe) | In my mind I'm going to Carolina
:you're gonna be the one that saves me | - back in Chapel Hill May 16th.
:And after all | Email address remains unchanged
:You're my firewall - | ........First in Usenet.........
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Blizzard | "The truth knocks on the door and you say
blizzard@nysernet.org | 'Go away. I'm looking for the truth,' and
NYSERNet, Inc. | so it goes away." --Robert Pirsig
-------------------------------------------------------------------
NODE 3468255fRe: Internal Passports
Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>Wed, 7 Aug 1996 11:24:51 +0800
If you want to pay _with a check_, you play by their rules. In fact, the
word "pay" might not completely appropriate in that transaction.
NODE 2496714eRe: Internal Passports
iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)Tue, 6 Aug 1996 11:45:31 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <199608042250.PAA13719@toad.com>,
Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>According to Alaska Airlines, the FAA's policy as of last week
>has switched to a mandatory policy that if you don't produce
>government-issued photo-id, you can't get on the plane;
>the previous policy had been more flexible.
So does anyone have any sort of "official" list as to what constitutes
"government-issued photo-id"? I'll be flying within California soon
(see you at Crypto...), as as a "furriner", I have no US ID. I do have
photo-id issued by _another_ government, though (a health card; I wonder
if they'll have heard of that...).
- Ian "I'd try to be sure to get to the airport early, but the plane
leaves at some ridiculous time like 7:30am"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMgafi0ZRiTErSPb1AQFsOQQAmxihUufsUh5EYbJ1aHrnP0zFomUb/uo9
qAScGSlWAzzpXYuXnZaG29VeSJ60b/haXaIbSR8C1X4oEIUjiv69gzYa/YJS7RTr
Vb4JEKZdJyiDPxZ7rlyVBquWGLBItazw4mkPAzFi4r6f0nnlXifq1zWGtTR7qakZ
1nGEEYfBeQE=
=h/Zx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----