// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: [SIGNAL] Microsoft's Internet Explorer

2 expanded posts · every known parent and child

NODE 47b4efd5Re: [SIGNAL] Microsoft's Internet Explorer
At 12:22 8/14/96, Jüri Kaljundi wrote:
> Wed, 14 Aug 1996, Frank Stuart kirjutas:
>
>> According to C-Net Radio (http://www.cnet.com/), Microsoft will be including
>> 128-bit SSL encryption in their Internet Explorer 3.0 for Win 95 and NT 4.0.
>
>As M$IE 3.0 is now available for download from www.microsoft.com, I did
>notice there is also a 128-bit version there, which requires you to first
>fill in data about you. Unfortunately microsoft.com is so slow right now,
>that I did not have a chance to try to download 128-bit version by filling
>in my favourite US politicians name.

I don't see the 128 bit version. URL?



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November.
   Vote Harry Browne for President.
NODE fa6b87c3Re: [SIGNAL] Microsoft's Internet Explorer
Wed, 14 Aug 1996, Lucky Green asked:

> I don't see the 128 bit version. URL?

Neither do I anymore, but it was there yesterday. It was on the page,
where you chose the version. After that there was a form asking for your
(US citizens) name, address and phone number. After that the connection
got so slow I could not submit the form.

I believe Microsoft might have messed up something with the ITAR rules and
because of problems they do not give out the 128-bit version anymore. Or
it might have been an error and they really did not have an uncrippled
version yesterday.

Jüri Kaljundi
AS Stallion
jk@stallion.ee