NODE a3177bc9F2 hash?
anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.comThu, 8 Aug 1996 08:56:31 +0800
Does anyone have a descriptoin of the F2 hash?
F2 is a secret hash from SecurityDynamics, and is used in
their client software. (Its not the hash in the cards, but
if anyone has a copy of that, it might be fun.)
I'd be very interested in seeing source code in the public
domain to try out a few hacks...
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
Bueller?
NODE 1ee8d071Re: F2 hash?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>Thu, 8 Aug 1996 09:36:08 +0800
Wed, 7 Aug 1996 anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com wrote:
> F2 is a secret hash from SecurityDynamics, and is used in
> their client software. (Its not the hash in the cards, but
> if anyone has a copy of that, it might be fun.)
As I have to deal with SecurID tokens in the nearest future, I would like
to hear more opinions about these cards. IMHO a proprietary algorithm like
used in those cards is a bad thing and I would like an open approach much
more, I still believe SecurID OTP cards are much better then usual
passwords.
At Defcon this year they promised to tell about some security flaws in
SecurID tokens, anyone know more about that?
Personally I believe that Security Dynamics should come out with some kind
of new systems in the nearest future, now that they own RSA.
Jüri Kaljundi
AS Stallion
jk@stallion.ee
NODE 5a0043edRe: F2 hash?
Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>Thu, 8 Aug 1996 14:52:19 +0800
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= wrote:
| Wed, 7 Aug 1996 anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com wrote:
|
| > F2 is a secret hash from SecurityDynamics, and is used in
| > their client software. (Its not the hash in the cards, but
| > if anyone has a copy of that, it might be fun.)
|
| As I have to deal with SecurID tokens in the nearest future, I would like
| to hear more opinions about these cards. IMHO a proprietary algorithm like
| used in those cards is a bad thing and I would like an open approach much
| more, I still believe SecurID OTP cards are much better then usual
| passwords.
I happen to run a mailing list, sdadmin, for folks to talk
about SDTI technologies. Talk to majordomo@jabberwocky.bbnplanet.com.
There are a number of cards out there. I've been looking at
CryptoCard & SNK recently, as well as V-One's smartmouse & virtual
smart card technologies.
I'd be very interested in seeing the algorithims come out,
especially F2. I have a few attacks that look very nice on paper that
I'd like to try out.
| At Defcon this year they promised to tell about some security flaws in
| SecurID tokens, anyone know more about that?
My understanding is that the guy who was going to give the
talk had nda difficulties. Vin? Did you make it out? The talk was
going to be on race conditions, denial of service attacks, and the
like.
| Personally I believe that Security Dynamics should come out with some kind
| of new systems in the nearest future, now that they own RSA.=20
This should be interesting, if they can find people to make things
happen before 2000.
Adam
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
NODE f0dd8206Re: F2 hash?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>Thu, 8 Aug 1996 18:56:54 +0800
Wed, 7 Aug 1996, Adam Shostack wrote:
> Jüri Kaljundi wrote:
>
> | At Defcon this year they promised to tell about some security flaws in
> | SecurID tokens, anyone know more about that?
>
> My understanding is that the guy who was going to give the
> talk had nda difficulties. Vin? Did you make it out? The talk was
> going to be on race conditions, denial of service attacks, and the
> like.
This is something that seems to be a little problematic to me. Considering
the 3-minute time slot, it seems fairly easy to somehow block the SecurID
server at the time a user is sending his username/passcode, steal that
information and allow a malicious user to enter that information into the
server. Or have I misunderstood some security aspects?
Jüri Kaljundi
AS Stallion
jk@stallion.ee
NODE de404fdeRe: F2 hash?
Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>Thu, 8 Aug 1996 23:48:00 +0800
This doesn't work as of version 1.3(?) and later. There is a time
delay before the 'ok' message is sent by the server. If it gets two
correct login attempts in the delay period (1-5 seconds, default 2),
it assumes an attack is underway and rejects them both.
Adam
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= wrote:
| Wed, 7 Aug 1996, Adam Shostack wrote:
| > J=FCri Kaljundi wrote:
| > | At Defcon this year they promised to tell about some security flaws in
| > | SecurID tokens, anyone know more about that?
| > =09My understanding is that the guy who was going to give the
| > talk had nda difficulties. Vin? Did you make it out? The talk was
| > going to be on race conditions, denial of service attacks, and the
| > like.
|
| This is something that seems to be a little problematic to me. Considering
| the 3-minute time slot, it seems fairly easy to somehow block the SecurID
| server at the time a user is sending his username/passcode, steal that
| information and allow a malicious user to enter that information into the
| server. Or have I misunderstood some security aspects?
|
| J=FCri Kaljundi
| AS Stallion
| jk@stallion.ee
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
NODE 3bf6b95dRe: F2 hash?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>Thu, 8 Aug 1996 22:34:09 +0800
Thu, 8 Aug 1996, Adam Shostack wrote:
> This doesn't work as of version 1.3(?) and later. There is a time
> delay before the 'ok' message is sent by the server. If it gets two
> correct login attempts in the delay period (1-5 seconds, default 2),
> it assumes an attack is underway and rejects them both.
Yes but what if you are able to block the correct user and only the bad
boy gets a chance to log in? Shouldn't be so hard thing to do.
Jüri Kaljundi
AS Stallion
jk@stallion.ee