NODE 574a84fcnon-secure network utilities - pointers?
Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>Tue, 13 Aug 1996 19:45:55 +0800
What cypherpunk-approved (tm) -- that is, cryptographically strong,
freely available, and well-implemented (reliable) -- network utilities are
available? I'm willing to agree to US-only license agreement iff I have
to...
I'm looking for secure telnet, ftp, talk, etc. that I can run over a
potentially insecure network (and their respective daemons).
Is SSL the way to go? (If so, what's the best implementation?) What
about other protocols? Is there some comprehensive {web,ftp}site
where I can find more information on this subject?
Please reply off-list to poodge@econ.berkeley.edu
thanks,
-sq
NODE 75287a56Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers?
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Thu, 15 Aug 1996 02:57:31 +0800
Sam Quigley writes:
> What cypherpunk-approved (tm) -- that is, cryptographically strong,
> freely available, and well-implemented (reliable) -- network utilities are
> available? I'm willing to agree to US-only license agreement iff I have
> to...
Try SSH and friends -- they are a pretty good thing.
http://www.ssh.fi/, I believe.
Perry
NODE cfd49295Re: non-secure network utilities - pointers?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee>Wed, 14 Aug 1996 00:42:28 +0800
Tue, 13 Aug 1996, Sam Quigley wrote:
> I'm looking for secure telnet, ftp, talk, etc. that I can run over a
> potentially insecure network (and their respective daemons).
SSH is one way to go, as besides secure rlogin and rsh you can also set up
secure encrypted tunnels between hosts for different applications, like X
or some other TCP/IP apps.
Have a look at http://www.ssh.fi/
SSLtelnet/SSLftp are an other option.
Jüri Kaljundi
AS Stallion
jk@stallion.ee