NODE 0b5e8183Re:PreRFD: comp.org.cypherpunks
mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)Wed, 21 Aug 1996 18:07:04 +0800
qut@netcom.com (Skip) writes:
> The Subject: line says it all.
>
> My suggestion number #1:
>
> No moderation.
Suggestion 1 on how to diminish the feeble S/N ratio on cypherpunks:
make it a newsgroup
Suggestion 2:
make it an unmoderated newsgroup
I can think of nothing that would cause the remaining clue to flee faster
than a CP newsgroup in wide distribution (if it were gatewayed to the list)
jim
NODE a4250133Re: PreRFD: comp.org.cypherpunks
ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)Thu, 22 Aug 1996 02:53:05 +0800
Jim McCoy wrote:
> qut@netcom.com (Skip) writes:
> > My suggestion number #1:
> > No moderation.
>
> Suggestion 1 on how to diminish the feeble S/N ratio on cypherpunks:
>
> make it a newsgroup
> Suggestion 2:
> make it an unmoderated newsgroup
How about making it a robomoderated newsgroup with only one enforced
rule, forbidding any crossposting?
- Igor.
NODE 7e4df637Re: PreRFD: comp.org.cypherpunks
qut@netcom.com (Skip, OBC)Thu, 22 Aug 1996 06:12:49 +0800
! Jim McCoy wrote:
! > qut@netcom.com (Skip) writes:
! > > My suggestion number #1:
! > > No moderation.
! >
! > Suggestion 1 on how to diminish the feeble S/N ratio on cypherpunks:
! >
! > make it a newsgroup
! > Suggestion 2:
! > make it an unmoderated newsgroup
!
! How about making it a robomoderated newsgroup with only one enforced
! rule, forbidding any crossposting?
If moderation, then why not moderator(s) who simply send out cancel
messages to everthing that is crossposted? Traditional moderated
newsgroups are technically inferior because all posts go through netnews
chokepoints and then depends on the moderator(s) who's inevitable
position has been the irresponsible one of keeping the position long
after they lose interest with the high volumes. Even if their was such
a person, there is still are chokepoint problem which is stupid to
engage in.
In any case, creation of comp.org.cypherpunks in no way means gatewaying
or shutting down cypherpunks@toad.com .
--
Love,
Skip, OBC
NODE 8d23241cRe: PreRFD: comp.org.cypherpunks
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Thu, 22 Aug 1996 09:05:31 +0800
qut@netcom.com (Skip, OBC) writes:
> ! Jim McCoy wrote:
> ! > qut@netcom.com (Skip) writes:
> ! > > My suggestion number #1:
> ! > > No moderation.
> ! >
> ! > Suggestion 1 on how to diminish the feeble S/N ratio on cypherpunks:
> ! >
> ! > make it a newsgroup
> ! > Suggestion 2:
> ! > make it an unmoderated newsgroup
> !
> ! How about making it a robomoderated newsgroup with only one enforced
> ! rule, forbidding any crossposting?
>
> If moderation, then why not moderator(s) who simply send out cancel
> messages to everthing that is crossposted? Traditional moderated
> newsgroups are technically inferior because all posts go through netnews
> chokepoints and then depends on the moderator(s) who's inevitable
> position has been the irresponsible one of keeping the position long
> after they lose interest with the high volumes. Even if their was such
> a person, there is still are chokepoint problem which is stupid to
> engage in.
>
> In any case, creation of comp.org.cypherpunks in no way means gatewaying
> or shutting down cypherpunks@toad.com .
How about a NoCeM-moderated newsgroup?
I.e., several parties can issue 'hide' NoCeM notices for whatever
material they consider off-topic, including cross-posts. Several
other parties can issue 'highlight' NoCeM's for articles they
consider particularly worthy.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
NODE 05b1a1a5Re: PreRFD: comp.org.cypherpunks
qut@netcom.com (Skip)Thu, 22 Aug 1996 12:52:02 +0800
ON
!
! qut@netcom.com (Skip, OBC) writes:
!
! > ! Jim McCoy wrote:
! > ! > qut@netcom.com (Skip) writes:
! > ! > > My suggestion number #1:
! > ! > > No moderation.
! > ! >
! > ! > Suggestion 1 on how to diminish the feeble S/N ratio on cypherpunks:
! > ! >
! > ! > make it a newsgroup
! > ! > Suggestion 2:
! > ! > make it an unmoderated newsgroup
! > !
! > ! How about making it a robomoderated newsgroup with only one enforced
! > ! rule, forbidding any crossposting?
! >
! > If moderation, then why not moderator(s) who simply send out cancel
! > messages to everthing that is crossposted? Traditional moderated
! > newsgroups are technically inferior because all posts go through netnews
! > chokepoints and then depends on the moderator(s) who's inevitable
! > position has been the irresponsible one of keeping the position long
! > after they lose interest with the high volumes. Even if their was such
! > a person, there is still are chokepoint problem which is stupid to
! > engage in.
! >
! > In any case, creation of comp.org.cypherpunks in no way means gatewaying
! > or shutting down cypherpunks@toad.com .
!
! How about a NoCeM-moderated newsgroup?
! I.e., several parties can issue 'hide' NoCeM notices for whatever
! material they consider off-topic, including cross-posts. Several
! other parties can issue 'highlight' NoCeM's for articles they
! consider particularly worthy.
With the advent of killfiles and all sorts of filtering capabilities,
there is no excuse for requiring moderation at all other than for
purposes of censorship.
! ---
!
! Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
! Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
!