NODE 8e94f1dfRe: Imprisoned for Not Having a Gun?
Hallam-Baker <hallam@ai.mit.edu>Sun, 11 Aug 1996 12:48:13 +0800
Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> SANDY SANDFORT
> In addition
> to the "exceptions," there was no penalty for violation of the
> law, thus making sure it was unenforceable. It was not a case
> of "pro-gun fascism" but of rough American political humor. At
> the very least it kept the city council out of more serious
> mischief.
Was there a bar against a person obtaining an injunction to
force someone to purchase a gun or a provision providing that
no liabilities would be incurred as a result of not owning one?
The law is much too important to start abusing to make political
points.
Phill
NODE d01c7bfeRe: Imprisoned for Not Having a Gun?
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Sun, 11 Aug 1996 13:26:23 +0800
Hallam-Baker writes:
> The law is much too important to start abusing to make political
> points.
An excellent argument for libertarianism, Mr. Hallam-Baker.
Perry