5 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child
Just a comment to all of the 'true libertarians' out there, especially the "defend to the death" types: How many of you defended Mr. Sternlight's recent membership? # Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> - Webpages for sale! Se habla JavaScript! # Automatically receive my resume or PGPKEY by sending email with a subject # of 'send PGPKEY' or 'send resume'. Capitalization counts so be careful! # Web site: http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htm
Someone wrote:
> Just a comment to all of the 'true libertarians' out there, especially
> the "defend to the death" types: How many of you defended Mr.
> Sternlight's recent membership?
There is nothing to defend. Anyone, including Dr. Sternlight, may
join this list at any time by mailing a "Suscrive" message to
toad.com, and may leave it at any subsequent time by sending another
message that says "unSuscrive."
It's totally user-operated. No intervention by anyone else required. :)
--
Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
mpd@netcom.com $ via Finger. $Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Just a comment to all of the 'true libertarians' out there
What does being a libertarian, or true libertarian, have to do with
wanting Sternlight on the list?
I strongly suspect you have a dramatic misunderstanding of
libertarianism.
> Sternlight's recent membership?
For what it's worth, I had no problem with D.S. being on the list. That
opinion has very, very little to do with my libertarian leanings, I assure
you.
______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX * For the time being,
m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com *
<URL:http://www.io.com/~m101> * three heads and eight arms.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Chris Adams wrote: > Just a comment to all of the 'true libertarians' out there, especially > the "defend to the death" types: How many of you defended Mr. > Sternlight's recent membership? I had absolutely no problem with Sternlight subscribing to cpunks. In fact, I would be opposed to any action that attempted to remove him from the list. I also have the right to killfile whomever I want to, and I will defend that right, also. However, if cpunks was a "closed" list with a definitive charter, I would not be displeased with any of the list owners who would prevent David Sternlight from subscribing or posting to the list. - -- Mark PGP encrypted mail prefered Key fingerprint = d61734f2800486ae6f79bfeb70f95348 http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMgFnUrZc+sv5siulAQGY3AP9GngPhL570IceIr+Ls8OaE3gIrTRWQVU6 4gvozv/4g0nEUmT/S+KcnM5ySIQACB2E8LlwG8F2Fb8fLHquywS9Ql28mwx0oCfY OjO/hycM4UGGx5W0nGli8dJ95mpzIm9VDZNsRbrIPKbo8s5bi55Dlx9BwsG28PY5 BVKWCMk+U/g= =mSZs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"Chris Adams" writes: > Just a comment to all of the 'true libertarians' out there, especially > the "defend to the death" types: How many of you defended Mr. > Sternlight's recent membership? Libertarianism means that you oppose *government* censorship -- not that you feel obligated to listen to every idiot who comes down the street. In other words -- I defend to the death the right of David Sternlight to say anything he likes. However, thats very different from feeling that anyone is required to listen, or saying that a privately run forum must tolerate him. Perry