NODE 08dff3f5Re: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.
Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)Thu, 19 Sep 1996 08:36:37 +0800
On Sun, 15 Sep 1996 17:13:53 -0700, Dale Thorn wrote:
>> And that's good. The world population really should go back to around
>> 1 billion for achieving a stabile ecology (with singing birds for
>> the peace of minds). The former (?) US system of encouraging young
>> standalone women to make babies to get benefits was very bad. The
>> Chinese system - less benefits the more children you have - is the
>> way to go.
>Just a comment: "The world population really should go back to around
>one billion", etc. And how could we achieve that without severe govt.
>oppression, one wonders? Now, I've heard of "education" being used to
>help the masses learn to be responsible citizens ad nauseam, but since
>education is pretty much just propaganda in the massively-capitalist
>system now taking over even the P.R. of China, how the heck is education
>going to work?
Well, they're much better at telling kids how to use condoms than they are at,
say, explaining an integral. (or even an equation for that matter)
As a side note, how about some real welfare reform: mandatory birth control
(and pay for that; it's *much* cheaper) and benefits go DOWN for additional
births.
# Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
# cadams@acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894
"I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on
a computer in any case when the whole system is a game. Word processing,
spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game. And they pay you to play it."
-- Duncan Frissell
NODE 942b1273Re: Workers Paradise. /Political rant.
snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>Mon, 23 Sep 1996 13:44:07 +0800
Mr. Adams wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Sep 1996 17:13:53 -0700, Dale Thorn wrote:
>>> And that's good. The world population really should go back to around
> say, explaining an integral. (or even an equation for that matter)
> As a side note, how about some real welfare reform: mandatory birth control
> (and pay for that; it's *much* cheaper) and benefits go DOWN for additional
> births.
<whine>
But, But, But...What about the <i>Children</i>?
</whine>
Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@smoke.suba.com