NODE 3aba96b9Re: [NOT NOISE] Jena Remailer
Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>Sun, 29 Sep 1996 14:30:55 +0800
At 04:10 PM 9/28/96 -0700, anonymous wrote:
>My first thought was to have them sent to a non-autopinging *.test ng
>via a well-tested parsing mail2news gate, but some autopingers ping ALL
>*.test traffic passing through a site. If these ping messages didn't
>get automatically bitbucketed at the remailer site, this could be a
>problem for the operator.
Most of the autopingers will ignore messages with "ignore" in
the Subject: line.
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs">
# You can get PGP software outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto
NODE 77c40ef1[NOT NOISE] Jena Temailer
mixmaster@remail.obscura.com (Mixmaster)Thu, 3 Oct 1996 13:08:38 +0800
stewarts@ix.netcom.com wrote:
s> At 04:10 PM 9/28/96 -0700, anonymous wrote:
>> My first thought was to have them sent to a non-autopinging *.test ng
>> via a well-tested parsing mail2news gate, but some autopingers ping
>> ALL *.test traffic passing through a site. If these ping messages
>> didn't get automatically bitbucketed at the remailer site, this could
>> be a problem for the operator.
s> Most of the autopingers will ignore messages with "ignore" in
s> the Subject: line.
We understand that, but the Jenaer Remailer configures the outgoing
message, which is essentially a digest of a user's recent mail, and
therefore the requestor has no control over the Subject: field.