NODE 3dbad9b0Too few nymservers
nobody@replay.com (Anonymous)Tue, 3 Sep 1996 05:39:03 +0800
On Sun 1 Sep 1996 Dave Harman OBC wrote :
[snip]
> There has to be more crypto anonymizing aliasing remailers and with
> easier interfaces. Closing the Kleinpaste derived server will help
> put the pressure of demand to start better remailer systems.
> There's not enough capacity and reliability with the servers extant.
> There should be thousands of full featured remailers.
Exactly. Sometimes *all* the nymservers are down at the same time.
NODE 69773596Re: Too few nymservers
lcs Remailer Administrator <mix-admin@nym.alias.net>Tue, 3 Sep 1996 09:06:48 +0800
> [snip]
> > There has to be more crypto anonymizing aliasing remailers and with
> > easier interfaces. Closing the Kleinpaste derived server will help
> > put the pressure of demand to start better remailer systems.
> > There's not enough capacity and reliability with the servers extant.
> > There should be thousands of full featured remailers.
>
> Exactly. Sometimes *all* the nymservers are down at the same time.
Well, I just designed a nymserver that's probably more complicated and
difficult to use than any previous one. From this experience, I have
concluded that if you want to design a remailer with real security (as
opposed to a penet-style server), it just won't be easy to use that
remailer manually. Even alpha.c2.org was kind of a pain to use
manually. I therefore think in the long run it's better to bite the
bullet, write as secure a nym server as possible, and expect that
people will use special client software to use the remailer.
Incidentally, if anyone else wants to run another nym.alias.net-style
remailer, the code is available and I'd be glad to help anyone set
things up if that person is serious about running a nymserver.