NODE 65ee98a3Crypto Num Mum, Hmm
jya@pipeline.com (John Young)Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:39:10 +0800
The Washington Post, September 9, 1996, p. A2.
Computers: Number Crunchers' 1 and Only
It's big. It's beautiful. And it's prime. Computer
scientists at Cray Research have discovered the largest
known prime number. A prime number, for those of us who
have forgotten grade school mathematics, can only be
divided by itself and by 1. Smaller primes include 2, 3, 5,
7 and 11. The new one, 2^1257787-1, is a bit bigger.
Printed out, the 378,632 digit number would take up 12
newspaper pages. "We're pretty confident that this is the
largest known prime number," said researcher Paul Gage.
There are an infinite number of primes but they are
extremely difficult to find. The newly discovered prime
number is of a type known a "Mersenne" prime, named for a
17th century French monk and mathematician. It is easier to
prove the prime-ness of Mersenne numbers than other primes,
thanks to complex mathematical software.
Cray runs the prime-testing program to search for bugs in
its new supercomputers. Gage said the discovery of the
prime was a happy byproduct of the process. The new number
was discovered during a six-hour run testing a new Cray T94
system.
Prime numbers are useful in the field of cryptography,
where they are used to help construct virtually unbreakable
codes. The new prime is far larger than those commonly
used. Said Gage, "A cryptographer interested in numbers
this big wouldn't be talking about it."
-- John Schwartz
[End]
NODE 8ddd33b3Re: Crypto Num Mum, Hmm
Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:46:09 +0800
It's kind of tempting to generate the key and certificate using this as q
and the previous largest as p, if only for machismo at keysignings :-)
---
Cause maybe (maybe) | In my mind I'm going to Carolina
you're gonna be the one that saves me | - back in Chapel Hill May 16th.
And after all | Email address remains unchanged
You're my firewall - | ........First in Usenet.........
NODE be53a2a5Re: Crypto Num Mum, Hmm
Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 20:59:18 +0800
Simon Spero wrote:
>
> It's kind of tempting to generate the key and certificate using this as q
> and the previous largest as p, if only for machismo at keysignings :-)
The machismo is that you know for sure your numbers are prime, rather
than being 99.999999% confident that they are. It is not hard to
generate prime numbers this large, it's just hard to prove they are
really prime. (Someobdy please correct me if I'm wrong about this).
Gary
--
"Of course the US Constitution isn't perfect; but it's a lot better
than what we have now." -- Unknown.
pub 1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22 Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Key fingerprint = 0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D 1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06