// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: take the pledge

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE fb60d3b3Re: take the pledge
Alright!   it's a genuine PerryGram!  I'll take the pledge; 
    I've never been able to answer Sternlight without being 
    significantly more offensive than usual!

        attila

 --
 one of the few things we all share: 
   the utter, corrosive contempt for our elected officials.


    --------------------------------------------------------

In, on 07/19/96 
   at 12:06 PM, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> said:

=Subject: take the pledge


=Look, folks, we all know that 99% of what David Sternlight posts is
=garbage. Why don't we all pledge not to answer any of his posts, and
=then he'll go away. If necessary, someone can be appointed to post a
=weekly "the views expressed by David are junk and we are deliberately
=not replying to them directly" message.

=David has plenty of places to argue with the wind. We don't need to
=add this one.

=I'd like to ask people to publically pledge that they will not reply
=to David's messages. This is such a pledge.

=Perry
NODE f198e053Re: take the pledge
Better late than never, I suppose. :)

- r.w.



On Sun, 8 Sep 1996, attila wrote:

>         Alright!   it's a genuine PerryGram!  I'll take the pledge; 
>     I've never been able to answer Sternlight without being 
>     significantly more offensive than usual!
> 
>         attila
> 
>  --
>  one of the few things we all share: 
>    the utter, corrosive contempt for our elected officials.
> 
> 
>     --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In, on 07/19/96 
>    at 12:06 PM, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> said:
> 
> =Subject: take the pledge
> 
> 
> =Look, folks, we all know that 99% of what David Sternlight posts is
> =garbage. Why don't we all pledge not to answer any of his posts, and
> =then he'll go away. If necessary, someone can be appointed to post a
> =weekly "the views expressed by David are junk and we are deliberately
> =not replying to them directly" message.
> 
> =David has plenty of places to argue with the wind. We don't need to
> =add this one.
> 
> =I'd like to ask people to publically pledge that they will not reply
> =to David's messages. This is such a pledge.
> 
> =Perry
> 
> 
> 
>