NODE 23389bf4linux ipsec question
Alex Strasheim <alex@proust.suba.com>Tue, 12 Nov 1996 13:48:12 -0800 (PST)
I've been off the list for quite awhile, so if this has been beat to
death already, I apologize.
Is there any kind of consensus of opinion on the linux-ipsec project?
What do people outside of the project think about it?
It seems like a very good thing to me, but I don't know much about s/wan,
so my opinion isn't worth much.
I'm a little curious as to how this project fits in with other secure IP
efforts. Will the linux-ipsec software interoperate with other
packages? How does it relate to IPv6? Policymaker?
Basically, I'm not very clear about the significance of this project. Is
it going to be a good package that I could use to encrypt traffic
between offices in NY and LA, or is it going to be a package that will
let me communicate securely with the net at large, using a well accepted
standard?
Finally, what do you all think about the basic way this is set up? I
mean, does it make sense to use a linux box with two net cards to protect
a lan? Or should secip software be built into individual devices, like
it is in IPv6? Is this a standard that might get picked up by someone
like cisco? Etc.
Thanks...
--
Alex Strasheim, alex@proust.suba.com
NODE e6a06755Returned mail: User Unknown
Open Net Postmaster <postmaster@opennet.net.au>Tue, 12 Nov 1996 19:26:21 -0800 (PST)
The address you mailed to is no longer valid.
This is probably because the user in question was an
old Open Net subscriber. Open Net is NO LONGER an ISP,
and has not been since May 1996.
We have no redirection address for that user. Please
remove them from any mailing lists you might have.
This response was generated automatically.