NODE 36f5969cRarity: Crypto question enclosed
"David K. Merriman" <merriman@amaonline.com>Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:03:02 -0800 (PST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Sun Nov 10 15:03:35 1996
Sorry that this message doesn't include any flames, "outings",
denigrations, or other stuff......
My simple question is regarding key/certificate distribution:
Is there any particular reason that such can't be accomplished via
on-line lists, and made available via a service on a port, using standard
(textual) commands, like mail and such are now?
The things that come to mind are a 'client' request for a key, a
'client' submission of a key, an external host requesting a key exchange,
and the host itself requesting a key exchange with another system (only
new/changed keys being swapped).
The way I see it working is similar to (but not as slow as, or
requiring the human intervention) of the key servers already existing.
Granted that the first few such servers might carry a higher load, but I'd
think that would taper off as the (presumably free) software became
available, similar to the growth of remailer software (which would seem to
be a fairly reasonable relationship....).
Hooks into existing PGP-fluent software shouldn't be difficult with
a standardized protocol, and I wouldn't think that the servers would be
that difficult to code and implement on a 'standard' (consistently used,
that is) port.
I'm willing to have a try at the first server, if the parameters
can be defined.
Dave Merriman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMoV+S8VrTvyYOzAZAQHlMQP/eU3F2JyaQcU6tQ+J5iCdAdPKiBNORJGT
chgNauyaH/dHwj+DzcKZzhmjabsICGZjPbJvH+DIvnbGx3eGF1Y2HUAHvt5ab4ww
gfPJ7xfjwNUJPyrTQtp7lXVdB5BVfSw/I2lHzSg1ssRvTo4iF+gIoAQypOT1Z617
Fo/c1h77KgA=
=pkk/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE a6811040Re: Rarity: Crypto question enclosed
Dave Kinchlea <security@kinch.ark.com>Sun, 10 Nov 1996 18:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Sounds a little like Hesiod to me.
cheers
On Sun, 10 Nov 1996, David K. Merriman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Date: Sun Nov 10 15:03:35 1996
> Sorry that this message doesn't include any flames, "outings",
> denigrations, or other stuff......
>
> My simple question is regarding key/certificate distribution:
>
> Is there any particular reason that such can't be accomplished via
> on-line lists, and made available via a service on a port, using standard
> (textual) commands, like mail and such are now?
>
> The things that come to mind are a 'client' request for a key, a
> 'client' submission of a key, an external host requesting a key exchange,
> and the host itself requesting a key exchange with another system (only
> new/changed keys being swapped).
>
> The way I see it working is similar to (but not as slow as, or
> requiring the human intervention) of the key servers already existing.
> Granted that the first few such servers might carry a higher load, but I'd
> think that would taper off as the (presumably free) software became
> available, similar to the growth of remailer software (which would seem to
> be a fairly reasonable relationship....).
>
> Hooks into existing PGP-fluent software shouldn't be difficult with
> a standardized protocol, and I wouldn't think that the servers would be
> that difficult to code and implement on a 'standard' (consistently used,
> that is) port.
>
> I'm willing to have a try at the first server, if the parameters
> can be defined.
>
> Dave Merriman
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
>
> iQCVAwUBMoV+S8VrTvyYOzAZAQHlMQP/eU3F2JyaQcU6tQ+J5iCdAdPKiBNORJGT
> chgNauyaH/dHwj+DzcKZzhmjabsICGZjPbJvH+DIvnbGx3eGF1Y2HUAHvt5ab4ww
> gfPJ7xfjwNUJPyrTQtp7lXVdB5BVfSw/I2lHzSg1ssRvTo4iF+gIoAQypOT1Z617
> Fo/c1h77KgA=
> =pkk/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
NODE 3832aeaaRe: Rarity: Crypto question enclosed
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Sun, 10 Nov 1996 21:40:18 -0800 (PST)
"David K. Merriman" <merriman@amaonline.com> writes:
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Date: Sun Nov 10 15:03:35 1996
> Sorry that this message doesn't include any flames, "outings",
> denigrations, or other stuff......
>
> My simple question is regarding key/certificate distribution:
...
Are you sure this is on-topic for John Gilmore's private mailing list?
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps