// COMPLETE THREAD

Rarity: Crypto question enclosed

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 36f5969cRarity: Crypto question enclosed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Sun Nov 10 15:03:35 1996
Sorry that this message doesn't include any flames, "outings", 
denigrations, or other stuff......

My simple question is regarding key/certificate distribution:

        Is there any particular reason that such can't be accomplished via 
on-line lists, and made available via a service on a port, using standard 
(textual) commands, like mail and such are now?

        The things that come to mind are a 'client' request for a key, a 
'client' submission of a key, an external host requesting a key exchange, 
and the host itself requesting a key exchange with another system (only 
new/changed keys being swapped).

        The way I see it working is similar to (but not as slow as, or 
requiring the human intervention) of the key servers already existing. 
Granted that the first few such servers might carry a higher load, but I'd 
think that would taper off as the (presumably free) software became 
available, similar to the growth of remailer software (which would seem to 
be a fairly reasonable relationship....).

        Hooks into existing PGP-fluent software shouldn't be difficult with 
a standardized protocol, and I wouldn't think that the servers would be 
that difficult to code and implement on a 'standard' (consistently used, 
that is) port.

        I'm willing to have a try at the first server, if the parameters 
can be defined.

Dave Merriman


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMoV+S8VrTvyYOzAZAQHlMQP/eU3F2JyaQcU6tQ+J5iCdAdPKiBNORJGT
chgNauyaH/dHwj+DzcKZzhmjabsICGZjPbJvH+DIvnbGx3eGF1Y2HUAHvt5ab4ww
gfPJ7xfjwNUJPyrTQtp7lXVdB5BVfSw/I2lHzSg1ssRvTo4iF+gIoAQypOT1Z617
Fo/c1h77KgA=
=pkk/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE a6811040Re: Rarity: Crypto question enclosed
Sounds a little like Hesiod to me.

cheers

On Sun, 10 Nov 1996, David K. Merriman wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Date: Sun Nov 10 15:03:35 1996
> Sorry that this message doesn't include any flames, "outings", 
> denigrations, or other stuff......
> 
> My simple question is regarding key/certificate distribution:
> 
>         Is there any particular reason that such can't be accomplished via 
> on-line lists, and made available via a service on a port, using standard 
> (textual) commands, like mail and such are now?
> 
>         The things that come to mind are a 'client' request for a key, a 
> 'client' submission of a key, an external host requesting a key exchange, 
> and the host itself requesting a key exchange with another system (only 
> new/changed keys being swapped).
> 
>         The way I see it working is similar to (but not as slow as, or 
> requiring the human intervention) of the key servers already existing. 
> Granted that the first few such servers might carry a higher load, but I'd 
> think that would taper off as the (presumably free) software became 
> available, similar to the growth of remailer software (which would seem to 
> be a fairly reasonable relationship....).
> 
>         Hooks into existing PGP-fluent software shouldn't be difficult with 
> a standardized protocol, and I wouldn't think that the servers would be 
> that difficult to code and implement on a 'standard' (consistently used, 
> that is) port.
> 
>         I'm willing to have a try at the first server, if the parameters 
> can be defined.
> 
> Dave Merriman
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> 
> iQCVAwUBMoV+S8VrTvyYOzAZAQHlMQP/eU3F2JyaQcU6tQ+J5iCdAdPKiBNORJGT
> chgNauyaH/dHwj+DzcKZzhmjabsICGZjPbJvH+DIvnbGx3eGF1Y2HUAHvt5ab4ww
> gfPJ7xfjwNUJPyrTQtp7lXVdB5BVfSw/I2lHzSg1ssRvTo4iF+gIoAQypOT1Z617
> Fo/c1h77KgA=
> =pkk/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
NODE 3832aeaaRe: Rarity: Crypto question enclosed
"David K. Merriman" <merriman@amaonline.com> writes:
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Date: Sun Nov 10 15:03:35 1996
> Sorry that this message doesn't include any flames, "outings",
> denigrations, or other stuff......
>
> My simple question is regarding key/certificate distribution:
...

Are you sure this is on-topic for John Gilmore's private mailing list?

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps