// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: IPG Algorith Broken!

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 51f8843aRe: IPG Algorith Broken!
At 11:21 AM 11/24/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
>
>> > On Sat, 23 Nov 1996, John Anonymous MacDonald wrote:
>> > > diGriz
>> > 
>> > Use an anon. remailer and sign your posts.  Brilliant.  Just brilliant.
>
>Actually, rather clever if you're trying to estlablish reputation.  Just
>make sure you use the right key.

Reputation is not the only reason to use a "name" with an anon remailer.
Sometimes you want to post (and have a reputation) that is entirely
seperable from your "real life" persona.  Maybe you have a job where being
involved with "The Evil Cypherpunks(tm)" could result in hastles at work
(or even firing) if known.  (I recieved flack from one company I worked
with for posting here... Until they needed a remailer set up and someone to
explain how their software worked...  But that is another story.)

Cypherpunks is gated to a number of Usenet News servers.  (Teleport is a
good example.)  It is also archived in a number of search engines.
(Altavista if I remember correctly, is one of them.)  Someone who does not
want their words to come back any byte them might just use such a method to
protect themselves.

---
|              "Remember: You can't have BSDM without BSD."              |
|"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer:         |
| mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!"  | Ignore the man      |
|`finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key  | behind the keyboard.|
|         http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/       |alan@ctrl-alt-del.com|
NODE 766c6370Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
On Sun, 24 Nov 1996, Alan Olsen wrote:

> >Actually, rather clever if you're trying to estlablish reputation.  Just
> >make sure you use the right key.

very true 

> Reputation is not the only reason to use a "name" with an anon remailer.
> Sometimes you want to post (and have a reputation) that is entirely
> seperable from your "real life" persona.  Maybe you have a job where being

Stay with one nym long enough and the opposite may become true.  I've used
this nym for so long -- though not in these circles -- that I elected to
associate my true name with it.  The nym had far more built-up repuation
that my true name ever would.  (Of course, that's all meaningless here.)

Besides, I *like* the nym.  There is that psychological component of playing
with an alter-ego.  A lot can be said and done behind the veil of a nym that
might not be otherwise.  While many see this a threatening condition I have
always viewed it as an advantage.  Furthermore, it is a somewhat ironic
avenue to truth.  Politeness is not always conducive to getting to the heart
of an issue; nyms have little need for politeness or sugarcoating.

> Cypherpunks is gated to a number of Usenet News servers.  (Teleport is a
> good example.)  It is also archived in a number of search engines.
> (Altavista if I remember correctly, is one of them.)  Someone who does not
> want their words to come back any byte them might just use such a method to
> protect themselves.

And I would assume another nym in such a circumstance.

_______________________________________________________________
 Omegaman <mailto:omega@bigeasy.com> 
  PGP Key fingerprint = 6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2
                        59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 63 
 Send e-mail with "get key" in the "Subject:" 
 field to get a copy of my public key
_______________________________________________________________