NODE 51f8843aRe: IPG Algorith Broken!
Alan Olsen <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>Sun, 24 Nov 1996 12:20:29 -0800 (PST)
At 11:21 AM 11/24/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
>
>> > On Sat, 23 Nov 1996, John Anonymous MacDonald wrote:
>> > > diGriz
>> >
>> > Use an anon. remailer and sign your posts. Brilliant. Just brilliant.
>
>Actually, rather clever if you're trying to estlablish reputation. Just
>make sure you use the right key.
Reputation is not the only reason to use a "name" with an anon remailer.
Sometimes you want to post (and have a reputation) that is entirely
seperable from your "real life" persona. Maybe you have a job where being
involved with "The Evil Cypherpunks(tm)" could result in hastles at work
(or even firing) if known. (I recieved flack from one company I worked
with for posting here... Until they needed a remailer set up and someone to
explain how their software worked... But that is another story.)
Cypherpunks is gated to a number of Usenet News servers. (Teleport is a
good example.) It is also archived in a number of search engines.
(Altavista if I remember correctly, is one of them.) Someone who does not
want their words to come back any byte them might just use such a method to
protect themselves.
---
| "Remember: You can't have BSDM without BSD." |
|"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: |
| mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man |
|`finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.|
| http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/ |alan@ctrl-alt-del.com|
NODE 766c6370Re: IPG Algorith Broken!
Omegaman <omega@bigeasy.com>Mon, 25 Nov 1996 19:28:53 -0800 (PST)
On Sun, 24 Nov 1996, Alan Olsen wrote:
> >Actually, rather clever if you're trying to estlablish reputation. Just
> >make sure you use the right key.
very true
> Reputation is not the only reason to use a "name" with an anon remailer.
> Sometimes you want to post (and have a reputation) that is entirely
> seperable from your "real life" persona. Maybe you have a job where being
Stay with one nym long enough and the opposite may become true. I've used
this nym for so long -- though not in these circles -- that I elected to
associate my true name with it. The nym had far more built-up repuation
that my true name ever would. (Of course, that's all meaningless here.)
Besides, I *like* the nym. There is that psychological component of playing
with an alter-ego. A lot can be said and done behind the veil of a nym that
might not be otherwise. While many see this a threatening condition I have
always viewed it as an advantage. Furthermore, it is a somewhat ironic
avenue to truth. Politeness is not always conducive to getting to the heart
of an issue; nyms have little need for politeness or sugarcoating.
> Cypherpunks is gated to a number of Usenet News servers. (Teleport is a
> good example.) It is also archived in a number of search engines.
> (Altavista if I remember correctly, is one of them.) Someone who does not
> want their words to come back any byte them might just use such a method to
> protect themselves.
And I would assume another nym in such a circumstance.
_______________________________________________________________
Omegaman <mailto:omega@bigeasy.com>
PGP Key fingerprint = 6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2
59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 63
Send e-mail with "get key" in the "Subject:"
field to get a copy of my public key
_______________________________________________________________