// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: [NOISE]Re: Dr. Vulis

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 7c6aea92Re: [NOISE]Re: Dr. Vulis
On or About  3 Nov 96 at 14:46, Derek Bell wrote:

>  I'm not happy with the barring of Vulis from the list

Just want to add my 2 cents.  I am also unhappy with the fact that he 
was removed.  My personal correspondence with Vulis has been friendly 
and he has been very helpful.

Ross

=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ross Wright
King Media: Bulk Sales of Software Media and Duplication Services
http://www.slip.net/~cdr/kingmedia
Voice: 415-206-9906
NODE c9e1f117Re: [NOISE]Re: Dr. Vulis
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

> Just want to add my 2 cents.  I am also unhappy with the fact that he 
> was removed.  My personal correspondence with Vulis has been friendly 
> and he has been very helpful.

Then I suggest that Ross not remove Dimitri from his private 
e-mail correspondence.  On this list, however, Dimitri was NOT 
friendly NOR helpful.  

Wha do Ross' or anyone else's private interactions have to do 
with the decisions of those who pay for this list's existance?


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NODE fa5ebb4bRe: [NOISE]Re: Dr. Vulis
Ross Wright wrote:
> On or About  3 Nov 96 at 14:46, Derek Bell wrote:
> >  I'm not happy with the barring of Vulis from the list

> Just want to add my 2 cents.  I am also unhappy with the fact that he was removed.
> My personal correspondence with Vulis has been friendly and he has been very helpful.

Someone (Gilmore?) mentioned new subscribers being a problem, not knowing how to filter
and so on.  Would periodic postings for new subscribers, in addition to the initial
welcome message, be a possible solve for this?

Please don't curse me for this next idea, as I'm not really familiar with what goes on
on a mail server:  How about if everyone could send to the list with the subject line
containing in [] brackets one of several strings from a list maintained by the server,
examples being [NOISE], [RANT], [CRYPTO], [NEWS] etc., and for postings without one of
the selections, the line could default to [NOISE] or whatever.

I don't mean to propose anything heavy-handed, but there ought to be a way to apply
a *little* more technology to get a *little* cleaner list, without impeding the "lower 
end" of the signal.  Unless, of course, there are other technical or personal reasons
for blocking the "Doctor" that I'm not aware of.