// COMPLETE THREAD

FW: Now we have it all

2 expanded posts · every known parent and child

NODE 7e6c197cFW: Now we have it all "Butler, Scott" <SButler@chemson.com>Wed, 6 Nov 1996 02:44:52 -0800 (PST)

>
Abaddon wrote:

>>susbscribe

Surely we have seen it all now.
I find it hard to believe that a word like
suscribe....subsribe....subcribes..
SUBSCRIBE..is so difficult to spell correctly.

:-)
ScOtT

NODE 07cf07e7Re: FW: Now we have it all "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>Wed, 6 Nov 1996 10:01:53 -0800 (PST)

At 10:47 AM +0100 11/6/96, Butler, Scott wrote:
>>
>Abaddon wrote:
>
>>>susbscribe
>
>Surely we have seen it all now.
>I find it hard to believe that a word like
>suscribe....subsribe....subcribes..
>SUBSCRIBE..is so difficult to spell correctly.
>
>:-)

This is actually steganography. Various spellings of "subscribe" are being
used to communicate a bit or two per message.

Actually, the practice becomes a code, as in:

"Suscrive if by sea, sudcribe if by land."

--Klaus! von Future Prime