// COMPLETE THREAD

Securing Electronic Mail Within HMG

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE f2519c64Securing Electronic Mail Within HMG
We have received from an anonymous source a document titled:

"Securing Electronic Mail Within HMG, Part I, Infrastructure 
and Protocol." 21 March 1996.

>From the Introduction:

"This document is the first part of CESG's recommendations for 
securing electronic mail within HMG. The main objective of the 
recommendations is to facilitate pan-government secure inter-
operability of electronic mail, by simplifying the implementation 
of secure electronic mail within government, ensuring secure 
electronic mail between departments is possible, attempting to 
facilitate future inter-operability with commercial users,
maximising the use of commercial technology in a controlled manner,
whilst allowing access to keys for data recovery or law enforcement 
purposes if required."

Other sections describe:

2. Authentication Framework

3. Confidentiality Framework

4. Security Protocol

The document refers to the Royal Holloway program for TTP critiqued 
by Ross Anderson and others as "EuroClipper." Perhaps those with 
more knowledge could make an assessment.

The document consists of 13 pages of text and diagrams, with 
a few gaps.

-----

http://jya.com/sem.htm  (35 kb with 7 jpg images)
NODE ffe5d396Re: Securing Electronic Mail Within HMG
John Young wrote:
> 
> We have received from an anonymous source a document titled:
> 
> "Securing Electronic Mail Within HMG, Part I, Infrastructure 
> and Protocol." 21 March 1996.
> 
> From the Introduction:
> 
> "This document is the first part of CESG's recommendations for 
> securing electronic mail within HMG. The main objective of the 
> recommendations is to facilitate pan-government secure inter-
> operability of electronic mail, by simplifying the implementation 
> of secure electronic mail within government, ensuring secure 
> electronic mail between departments is possible, attempting to 
> facilitate future inter-operability with commercial users,
> maximising the use of commercial technology in a controlled manner,
> whilst allowing access to keys for data recovery or law enforcement 
> purposes if required."
> 
> Other sections describe:
> 
> 2. Authentication Framework
> 
> 3. Confidentiality Framework
> 
> 4. Security Protocol
> 
> The document refers to the Royal Holloway program for TTP critiqued 
> by Ross Anderson and others as "EuroClipper." Perhaps those with 
> more knowledge could make an assessment.
> 
> The document consists of 13 pages of text and diagrams, with 
> a few gaps.

This document is available on the Web, at:

http://www.xopen.org/public/tech/security/pki/casm/casm.htm

see also my "addendum" to Anderson & Roe's paper (which is actually a critique
of the above proposal, rather than RH itself) at:

http://www.algroup.co.uk/crypto/rh.html

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie                Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435  Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
Freelance Consultant and  Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
Technical Director        URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
A.L. Digital Ltd,         Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org)
London, England.          Apache-SSL author