NODE 092e67afRe: With my deepest regards....
AwakenToMe@aol.comMon, 30 Dec 1996 10:01:17 -0800 (PST)
In a message dated 96-12-29 16:00:50 EST, dthorn@gte.net (Dale Thorn) writes:
<<
Adam Breaux wrote:
> I am withdrawing from this list. Not because of the volume of
> email...that I can deal with...but what I cannot deal with is the
> volume of garbage and egotistical ranting that seems so prevalent in
> what should for all sakes and purposes be a discussion of cyphering
> and security. Apparently the name of this list is designed to
> mislead...because of all the posts, a grand total of 5% proved worth
> reading at all.
Note to cypherpunks: This guy complains about the problem, but he *is*
the problem. *He* wants to tell us *he's* leaving. Talk about ego-
tistical ranting! What a hypocrite.
BTW, 5% is a pretty good percentage in my book.
>>
Since I never said I dont contribute to the problem.. I think Ill point
out... that in a reverse notion...He isn't the problem. What you replied
back is the problem. I DONT see this list (the other 95%) filled with people
saying that they dont like the list. So..since he isnt the other 95% (maybe
>0.5% complain) and you with a useless post... are (is) the porblem. I know
this post back doesn''t 'help' but I think it brings to light problems with a
list that exists for a purpose. Think of it as a democracy on a list. It
exists for a reason.. and the people support THAT existence.
NODE 98f621dcRe: With my deepest regards....
Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:14:13 -0800 (PST)
AwakenToMe@aol.com wrote:
> Adam Breaux wrote:
> > I am withdrawing from this list. Not because of the volume of
> > email...that I can deal with...but what I cannot deal with is the
> > volume of garbage and egotistical ranting[snippo]
> Note to cypherpunks: This guy complains about the problem, but he *is*
> the problem. *He* wants to tell us *he's* leaving. Talk about ego-
> tistical ranting! What a hypocrite.
> Since I never said I dont contribute to the problem.. I think Ill point
> out... that in a reverse notion...He isn't the problem. What you replied
> back is the problem.
Argumentum ad nauseam. The point is, Adam (I think) wanted to tell us
he's leaving. Well, who gives a shit, anyway? Instead of ranting
against me, tell the cypherpunks why they should care that this
particular individual is "leaving the list".