// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Wired Integrity

2 expanded posts · every known parent and child

NODE a97fa56eRe: Wired Integrity nobody@cypherpunks.ca (John Anonymous MacDonald, a remailer node)Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:52:50 -0800 (PST)

At 4:35 PM 12/13/1996, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>> What is troubling is that it is written by Sandy Sandfort who
>> works at C2Net....
>
>...At the time I wrote and submitted the article I neither worked 
>for Sameer...

Thank you for the clear explanation.

Just so you know, I did not doubt your integrity for an instant.

Wired should have appended a short paragraph explaining the possible
conflict of interest.

The Little Green Man

NODE 50de535aRe: Wired Integrity Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>Sat, 14 Dec 1996 01:09:42 -0800 (PST)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Fri, 13 Dec 1996 nobody@cypherpunks.ca wrote:

> Wired should have appended a short paragraph explaining the
> possible conflict of interest.

I agree.  It was an editorial decision, of course, but I think
it would have been the best course of action.

 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~