NODE 2442ffb5Intellectual dishonesty
logos <logos@c2.net>Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Dimitri Vulis wrote:
> > LOGOS <logos@c2.net> writes:
> >
> > Yes, that and other catagorizations which are
> > irrelevant to the primary focus of this list.
> It's funny that you should say this, since Tim May and other prominent
> "cypher punks" devote so much attention to their "enemies'" ethnicity and
> religion. Recall the attacks on "crazy Russians", "immigrants who abuse
> American freedoms", the recent attack on Hispanics, the attacks on Jews,
> the attacks on Mormons...
Yes I do recall some of those statements. Since you
feel that those 'attacks' were inappropriate, is it not
intellectually dishonest to engage in such 'attacks'
yourself? If it was wrong for them, how can it be right
for you?
If your age, sex, sexual preference, race, ethnicity,
mother tongue, nationality, etc. are irrelevant to the
discussions on this list, what possible justification is
there for you to raise such issues in my case?
I wrote:
> > In any case, it is a good example of the informal logical
> > fallacy of 'over generalization'. As I understand it, there
> > are circa 1000 people subscribed to Cypherpunks. To paint
> > an entire group with such a characterization is both
> > illogical and unfair. I also question your use of the
To which you replied:
> What about painting entire ethnic or religion groups, as Timmy May does?
This is truly a non-sequitor. I am sure you know
better than this. Tim May is responsible for his actions;
you are responsible for yours. Taken to it's logical
conclusion, if Tim were to murder a random Russian
immigrant, you would be justified in killing a random
native American.
As I said before, you are obviously too smart to
seriously entertain such an irrational viewpoint. Thus
it is difficult to draw any conclusion other then that
you are rationalizing your inappropriate behaviour.
> You sound like someone who doesn't read this list, but only "reads the
> logs" and sees the complaints from the likes of Arsen...
Actually, I read it quite thoroughly.
> I've recently quoted the selected writings of Paul Bradley, most of
> which were far more "uncultured; crude; or boorish" that anything I
> ever said. For example: [elided]
Again, would you please explain the logical basis
for committing the same abuses you cite from others? I
would think you would seek to distance yourself from such
behavior, rather than to exceed it. The inappropriate
abuse of the 1000 members of this list by others can in no
way excuse their further abuse by you.
> > It is obvious to me that you are an intelligent person.
> > I am concerned, however, with your apparent intellectual
> > dishonesty. It would appear that you know perfectly well
> You want intellectual dishonesty - look upstairs from toad.com.
No, I want intellectual honesty. But even if I look
upstairs from toad.com and find intellectual dishonesty,
how would that in any way mitigate your apparent
intellectual dishonesty? Are you arguing that one is
somehow dependent on, or the result of the other? This
makes no sense to me. Does it to you?
> > that your posts serve no purpose in the cause of promoting
> > privacy through the use of cryptography. It is hard to
> > draw any other conclusion then that you are intentionally
> > being provocative for the purpose of disrupting the work
> > of this list. If this is not so, I apologize, but how
> > else can we judge your actions? Please step outside of
> > yourself for a moment and give us an honest self-assessment
> > of your behavior and the motives behind it.
> The work of this list appears to be character assassination. If people like
> Paul Bradley and Tim May insist on slandering people and trying to harm
> their professional reputations (see the thread on "don't hire" lists),
> I will do my best to defend them and their freedom of speech,...
The above does not appear to make sense. Did you leave
something out? It is unclear to me how rude and provocative
personal attacks and broad, unkind generalizations about
Cypherpunk list members defends freedom of speech, protects
privacy or promotes cryptography. Would you please explain
the rationale behind your actions?
Logos out
NODE bbac6470Re: Intellectual dishonesty
"Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>Wed, 4 Dec 1996 23:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Though I have some suspicions that "Logos" is someone I know in Real Life,
I've come to think he's as bad for the list as Vulis, Grubor, and the
others are.
His "superficial decorum" does not hide a deeper viciousness and cluelessness.
At 10:12 PM -0800 12/4/96, logos wrote:
>Dimitri Vulis wrote:
...
>> It's funny that you should say this, since Tim May and other prominent
>> "cypher punks" devote so much attention to their "enemies'" ethnicity and
>> religion. Recall the attacks on "crazy Russians", "immigrants who abuse
>> American freedoms", the recent attack on Hispanics, the attacks on Jews,
>> the attacks on Mormons...
>
> Yes I do recall some of those statements. Since you
>feel that those 'attacks' were inappropriate, is it not
>intellectually dishonest to engage in such 'attacks'
>yourself? If it was wrong for them, how can it be right
>for you?
Fatuous nonsense. The "attacks" Vulis refers to were satirical. This has
been lost in the Noise of the Big Lie.
Logos is now the 17th resident of my Eudora filter file.
--Tim May
P.S. I certainly hope this "Logos" nym is not who I suspect it is, as this
will surely end our Real World friendship. A fucking bozo.
Just say "No" to "Big Brother Inside"
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
NODE 543e0f00Re: Intellectual dishonesty
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Thu, 5 Dec 1996 05:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Timmy May <tcmay@got.net> farts:
> Though I have some suspicions that "Logos" is someone I know in Real Life,
Me too.
> P.S. I certainly hope this "Logos" nym is not who I suspect it is, as this
> will surely end our Real World friendship. A fucking bozo.
Timmy May (fart) lies. He has no friends except lady Palm and her 5 daughters.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps