RE: permanent invasion of privacy

From:	Dale Thorn, who hasn't a clue

[on why the cpunks of late haven't discussed children's point of view]:
	Not lately?  And why is that?

Don't know, Dale.   Would everyone please send a message to Dale, 
explaining why you haven't been discussing this?
--

[on the possibility that abused children might be helped by the uses of 
encryption]:
	How is an abused child going to be helped by encryption?

Why are you on this list, Dale?
--

[on why, as I said, "empathy with children is not borne of government, but 
of a normal state of
mind"]:
	That's just rhetoric.  What normal state of mind? 	

Takes one to know one, Dale.
--

[on going out to alt.philosphy.objectivism to evoke detailed discussions of 
pertinence to his interest in benefitting from government programs]:

	In other words, if it doesn't offer something for me,
	the selfish adult, I don't wanna hear it.	

I'm not *obliged* to hear, it Dale.

    ..
Blanc

blanc wrote:
> From:   Dale Thorn, who hasn't a clue
> [on why the cpunks of late haven't discussed children's point of view]:
>         Not lately?  And why is that?

> Don't know, Dale.   Would everyone please send a message to Dale,
> explaining why you haven't been discussing this?

If all you want to be is an asshole, why do you bother with me?
Surely you could pick a more "respected" target, yes?
Looks like you:
1. Don't have anything to do, and
2. Feel insecure, and
3. Feel inferior to me (wonder why), and
4. Don't have any real answers.

> [on the possibility that abused children might be helped by the uses of
> encryption]: How is an abused child going to be helped by encryption?

> Why are you on this list, Dale?

To get non-answers from ignorants like yourself, I guess.

> [on why, as I said, "empathy with children is not borne of government, but
> of a normal state of mind"]:
>         That's just rhetoric.  What normal state of mind?

> Takes one to know one, Dale.

I hope you're saying that I'm not on the same wavelength as you and
*certain* other c-punks.  I feel better already.

> [on going out to alt.philosphy.objectivism to evoke detailed discussions of
> pertinence to his interest in benefitting from government programs]:
>         In other words, if it doesn't offer something for me,
>         the selfish adult, I don't wanna hear it.

> I'm not *obliged* to hear, it Dale.

Yeah, but you're obliged to partake one way or the other.
Ya' know, you and a few other people whine a lot about government
intrusion this or that (when you take your head out of the sand
momentarily), but like selfish little children, you cover your ears
when the news is unpleasant, like that's going to make a difference.

Maybe if you got off your ass and did something worthwhile for society,
things would really change for the better.  But I won't hold my breath.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

blanc:

        you know, the last time one of them fuzzy weird colored things, 
    you know, the kind which is always crawling around the edge of any 
    gathering with stick signs and chanting, ...well, the other day one 
    them things accidently crossed my sights, and my whole trigger hand 
    went into an involuntary spasm.  

        ...well, the judge he told me to take my medication and 
    dismissed the charges.  As I thanked the judge and reminded him of 
    the meeting tonight, I remembered the fuzzy little thing's last 
    words: "...Tax the Rich." 

        ...you know, that fuzzy little thing really looked like that 
    city slicker flatlander what up here last month --Dale or somethin' 
    like it! 

        I did not quite understand the significance of that, but I 
    thought to myself: 

            "oh, yeah, that's right: 'Nuke the Whales'."

        --just more words from attila
  ==
  "Expecting the world to treat you fairly 
    because you are a good person 
    is a little like expecting the bull 
    not to attack you because you are a vegetarian." 
        --Dennis Wholey

    ------------------ original messsage ------------------------  

In <32B96006.13B0@gte.net>, on 12/19/96 
   at 07:32 AM, Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net> said:

::blanc wrote:
::> From:   Dale Thorn, who hasn't a clue
::> [on why the cpunks of late haven't discussed children's point of view]: >        
::Not lately?  And why is that?

::> Don't know, Dale.   Would everyone please send a message to Dale, >
::explaining why you haven't been discussing this?

::If all you want to be is an asshole, why do you bother with me?
::Surely you could pick a more "respected" target, yes?
::Looks like you:
::1. Don't have anything to do, and
::2. Feel insecure, and
::3. Feel inferior to me (wonder why), and
::4. Don't have any real answers.

::> [on the possibility that abused children might be helped by the uses of >
::encryption]: How is an abused child going to be helped by encryption?

::> Why are you on this list, Dale?

::To get non-answers from ignorants like yourself, I guess.

::> [on why, as I said, "empathy with children is not borne of government, but
::> of a normal state of mind"]:
::>         That's just rhetoric.  What normal state of mind?

::> Takes one to know one, Dale.

::I hope you're saying that I'm not on the same wavelength as you and *certain*
::other c-punks.  I feel better already.

::> [on going out to alt.philosphy.objectivism to evoke detailed discussions of
::> pertinence to his interest in benefitting from government programs]: >        
::In other words, if it doesn't offer something for me,
::>         the selfish adult, I don't wanna hear it.

::> I'm not *obliged* to hear, it Dale.

::Yeah, but you're obliged to partake one way or the other.
::Ya' know, you and a few other people whine a lot about government intrusion
::this or that (when you take your head out of the sand momentarily), but like
::selfish little children, you cover your ears when the news is unpleasant,
::like that's going to make a difference.

::Maybe if you got off your ass and did something worthwhile for society,
::things would really change for the better.  But I won't hold my breath.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
Comment: Encrypted with 2.6.3i. Requires 2.6 or later.

iQCVAwUBMrmOYr04kQrCC2kFAQFITAQAtPLtCDijDmgQUnmnbfr7nHs9C9u89v7G
eiwddxrUiSaupIf9lqQiAt6x6jbuYE+ihTREnMXJypCiN/tPpPc72DVjEoJ3efxs
8T/jpgjPt1wyWfqFI76zxbyI7nXKCcpwVdX0eK0UniuxHb9MBRjsZxjRIc299QCI
ZYNqmUbKHYQ=
=LDSN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

attila@primenet.com wrote:
> blanc:
>         you know, the last time one of them fuzzy weird colored things,
>     you know, the kind which is always crawling around the edge of any
>     gathering with stick signs and chanting, ...well, the other day one
>     them things accidently crossed my sights, and my whole trigger hand
>     went into an involuntary spasm.
>         ...well, the judge he told me to take my medication and
>     dismissed the charges.  As I thanked the judge and reminded him of
>     the meeting tonight, I remembered the fuzzy little thing's last
>     words: "...Tax the Rich."
>         ...you know, that fuzzy little thing really looked like that
>     city slicker flatlander what up here last month --Dale or somethin'
>     like it!

I spent part of my growing up years in Leroy West Virginia, pop. about
15, give or take.  I know about hillbillies, and I know about guns.

If you had the impression I am a whiner, or that that defines me as a
person, you're about as clueful as the other old farts who attack people
they don't know anything about.  Note I said if, in case you decide to
repent sometime...

By the way, did you think that part about people supporting licensing
was pretty scary?  You know, people who are pretty well off don't like
to live in fear of gangs and stuff like that, and since those people
who have most of the money also have most of the power, it seems to me
they could pull it off. Now, you might be able to hide for a while if
you're clever enough and lucky enough, but I think some of them rich
folk gonna wanna trade some of their fear for some of yours, if you know
what I mean, and I think you do.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

        Oh, come on, Dale. loosen up and recognize satire when you see it.

        satire is a far cry from sarcasm, and although it may appear to 
    have a victim, it is more of a social comment in general.

        good sarcasm can even tell stories which are bald faced lies and 
    still not be dishonest --caveat emptor.

==
  I'll get a life when it is proven
    and substantiated to be better
      than what I am currently experiencing.
            --attila

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
Comment: Encrypted with 2.6.3i. Requires 2.6 or later.

iQCVAwUBMrp8kr04kQrCC2kFAQHYVwP/QwNZCVr034lH/yuJqanEc4aGeoKbJOwh
73yKSyOTRUI0Fll5X8Q8mgHGdMbN9TJTke3zstYztSe5MY5vrJnGGIPWTIIkQmXn
QYmNdNE4X0Ytaum32MEkbybi9VxmIZYEuD49dAAShKdQWMacWE6YnxAzKyYGi5Rp
T1iaYRdcZo8=
=p0Vu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

attila@primenet.com wrote:
>         Oh, come on, Dale. loosen up and recognize satire when you see it.
>         satire is a far cry from sarcasm, and although it may appear to
>     have a victim, it is more of a social comment in general.
>         good sarcasm can even tell stories which are bald faced lies and
>     still not be dishonest --caveat emptor.

I enjoy the occasional moments of humor here, even when it doesn't show.
Do you play poker well?

One thing I like to do myself is switch sides and taunt the subscribers
with "what's gonna happen when Hillary wins", and stuff of that nature.

The part that's both hilarious (no pun intended) and very scary is
that it really could happen.

Enjoy your life while you still have the chance (hee hee).

Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net> writes:

> blanc wrote:
> > From:   Dale Thorn, who hasn't a clue
> > [on why the cpunks of late haven't discussed children's point of view]:
> >         Not lately?  And why is that?
>
> > Don't know, Dale.   Would everyone please send a message to Dale,
> > explaining why you haven't been discussing this?
>
> If all you want to be is an asshole, why do you bother with me?
> Surely you could pick a more "respected" target, yes?
> Looks like you:
> 1. Don't have anything to do, and
> 2. Feel insecure, and
> 3. Feel inferior to me (wonder why), and
> 4. Don't have any real answers.

Yes, Blanc is a typical ignorant "cypher punk".  What a maroon.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps