Re: Stinger Specs

At 07:08 PM 12/5/96 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
>This has all vanished is our zeal
>to protect youth and society from any activity which might lead injury or
>misuse.  I can't even find a place to buy a niece a real chemistry set as
>tort laws have forced them from the market.  When considering the plumeting
>interest and achievement of our youth in math and science we look nor
>further for a reason.

When Wernher von Braun (if the reader doesn't know who von Braun was, shame
on your teachers. Hint: first human on the Moon.) first became interested
in rocketry, he was a student of music. Classical piano, to be exact. He
got his hands on a book about using rockets for space exploration. To his
dismay, the book was full of mathematical equations. He went to his math
teacher, asking him for help with the equations. The teacher must have been
of help, since von Braun went on to become the single most knowledgable
person in his field. And no, it wasn't piano playing.

There is nothing like some real life challenges to spark a young person's
mind. Today, conducting the experiments that fueled von Braun's imagination
would be a felony. The mere posession of the chemicals he used in his early
twenties is illegal.

This country has set out on a project to dumb the minds of its young. With
great success.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
   Make your mark in the history of mathematics. Use the spare cycles of
   your PC/PPC/UNIX box to help find a new prime.
   http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/justforfun/prime.htm

Lucky Green wrote:

> There is nothing like some real life challenges to spark a young person's
> mind. Today, conducting the experiments that fueled von Braun's imagination
> would be a felony. The mere posession of the chemicals he used in his early
> twenties is illegal.
> 
> This country has set out on a project to dumb the minds of its young. With
> great success.

Quite.  I once heard a comment that young pyrotechnicians (?) go on to become 
either great scientists or great lawyers, presumably due to their having to 
explain to their parents the reason for large clouds of smoke etc.

Gary

Gary Howland wrote:
> 
> Lucky Green wrote:
> 
> > There is nothing like some real life challenges to spark a young person's
> > mind. Today, conducting the experiments that fueled von Braun's imagination
> > would be a felony. The mere posession of the chemicals he used in his early
> > twenties is illegal.
> > 
> > This country has set out on a project to dumb the minds of its young. With
> > great success.
> 
> Quite.  I once heard a comment that young pyrotechnicians (?) go on to become 
> either great scientists or great lawyers, presumably due to their having to 
> explain to their parents the reason for large clouds of smoke etc.
> 

or computer consultants

	- Igor.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


In <3.0.32.19961205212336.006a520c@netcom14.netcom.com>, on 12/05/96 
   at 09:24 PM, Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> said:

::At 07:08 PM 12/5/96 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
::>This has all vanished is our zeal
::>to protect youth and society from any activity which might lead 
::>injury or misuse.  I can't even find a place to buy a niece a real 
::>chemistry set as tort laws have forced them from the market.  When 
::>considering the plummeting >interest and achievement of our youth in 
::> math and science we look no further for a reason.

::When Wernher von Braun (if the reader doesn't know who von Braun was,
::shame on your teachers. Hint: first human on the Moon.) first became
::interested in rocketry, he was a student of music. Classical piano, to
::be exact. He got his hands on a book about using rockets for space
::exploration. To his dismay, the book was full of mathematical 
::equations. He went to his math teacher, asking him for help with the 
::equations. The teacher must have been of help, since von Braun went on 
::to become the single most knowledgable person in his field. And no, it 
::wasn't piano playing.

::There is nothing like some real life challenges to spark a young
::person's mind. Today, conducting the experiments that fueled von 
::Braun's imagination would be a felony. The mere possession of the 
::chemicals he used in his early twenties is illegal.

::This country has set out on a project to dumb the minds of its young.
::With great success.

    bingo!  and, how.  they have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams!

    I had a roommate at Harvard (late fifties) who had incredibly deep     
    pockets. his mother died his freshman year, leaving him her estate 
    on the tip of Fisher's Island, including the costal defense battery 
    positions and bunkers.

    he had an Apache twin for which I managed to get a license including 
    instrument very quickly --we then went to FI for weekends and 
    built and fired everything you can imagine.  only a few curious 
    paid us any mind as the closest estate to hers was at least 1/2 
    mile.

    can you imagine that today? --the tip guards the entrance to 
    the New London pig boat pens and the LI sound!  

    there were still plenty of professors with both knowledge on the 
    early rockets, and open enough to "private" teach. My advisor was a 
    Nobel prize winner, very accessible, and provided both help and 
    introductions to men most never knew even existed in the vast 
    science complex north of the yard.  most were in the same old 
    building (Pierce) with the RF screens on the outside walls to 
    shield against the primitive radar  --long dark and narrow halls.

    It is a whole different ball game in academia. men whom I have
    recently met are nothing like their predecessors who were open and
    warm --everyone is so "professional" and they are _cold_.

    sad story in general.

    some bright spots though, I guess.  I was rather surprised by
    experiments and their depths in AP Chemistry offered my third son
    by St George's Dixie High School --impressive and not the usual 
    restrictions on "oh, poor Johnny might hurt himself while clowning
    ...err learning."  a) we have better discipline which works; and
    b) we don't put up with those silly whiners (so far).

    but the future does not speak well with declining tests scores 
    which, for instance, require the SATs to be watered 20-30% so the
    median would still be 500!  to think that the pair of 800s I
    received in the 50s can be acquired by someone scoring less than
    650s --what value has the US placed on education?  enough so our
    students now rank well down in the second 10 on international 
    tests!  what makes that worse is the _majority_ of Korean
    students can perform --the lower 1/3 of our students have already
    dropped out of school, and the second third are too uneducated
    to participate.  junior colleges are graduating students who
    would not have passed out of tenth grade 20-30 years ago.

    and, the government wants more mind control --even Bitch's "It
    Takes a Global Village."  at least it's fat chance out here in
    the high desert.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
Comment: Encrypted with 2.6.3i. Requires 2.6 or later.

iQCVAwUBMqfRNr04kQrCC2kFAQHfxAP+NbZ4JZIjraKsVBAKLx60AAKYyFDeT8Ly
o8DAnYdfkuEtN04orz+fqFIKUeNjonglMYeIp/xGqTtQeqVRS6uURpD/K8EAxDR/
jv1EQanC2SrV6yc0TtiNwV9WTFlRrOZjt0gH3uwfv+yDPtgpDVaBL0b6sNH+6BDg
Sh7UaRbkeYo=
=Ssdu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attila wrote:

> to participate. junior colleges are graduating students who
> would not have passed out of tenth grade 20-30 years ago.

<etc. about Gen 3 (-5) as in Tim's example>

Isn't this merely an effect of mass education instead of
elite_only education? And the peak performers will do as
well as they ever did? Doesn't every generation claim that
the younger people get defective education in some sense?
The Latin speakers of Gen 1 were horrified that Gen 2 didn't
get a thorough understanding of classic Greek culture and
geometry (but started with 'sets' and 'subsets' instead). 

Science is still exploding in electro-physics, digital
programming, molecular biology and several other fields.
(I wonder what is happening in Pure Math with No Applications
- not even for Cryptography :) - these days?) And formal
education is gradually loosing to actual competence.

A real difference, though, is the relative lack of multidisciplinary
theorists nowadays, I mean with a deep understanding of several
'unrelated' fields of knowledge. Most of us with actual competence
in a certain area are SUBspecialists. This is natural since the
knowledge bases have exploded to become impossible for any one man
or woman to comprehend. An industrial cobol programmer probably
doesn't know shit about Java (perhaps a bad example; I'm not
a programmer, but I know a guy who makes a good living off cobol!)
and a PCR biochemist hacking DNA doesn't know shit about immunology
or molecular neurology. In bio-science there is a discipline
which tries to put all such kinds of specialties into a broader
understanding of the human/animal body and soul - it's called
physiology, and is a declining field with chronic lack of funds;
not much money in it. I'm sure there is a comparable discipline
of computer science that I'm not able to name (information theory??),
with similar economic problems. But there is still hope for the GMAU
(Grand Meta-Analysis of the Universe); AltaVista is a new, good start
for collecting ingredients :-)


So, I'm not worried. When I indulge in the inevitable bashing of
younger generations I stick to their bade taste of music, like rap
and hip-hop (but some acid house/techno is ok), and appearance, like
tatoos and piercing, and life-style, like working-out, cliff-climbing
and resorting to vitamins, herbal medicine and other useless stuff.
(But even so, psychodelic drugs are making a come-back which I think
is a Good Thing.)


Asgaard (Gen 2)

On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, Asgaard wrote:

> 
> Attila wrote:
> 
> > to participate. junior colleges are graduating students who
> > would not have passed out of tenth grade 20-30 years ago.
> 
> <etc. about Gen 3 (-5) as in Tim's example>
> 
> Isn't this merely an effect of mass education instead of
> elite_only education? And the peak performers will do as
> well as they ever did? Doesn't every generation claim that
> the younger people get defective education in some sense?
> The Latin speakers of Gen 1 were horrified that Gen 2 didn't
> get a thorough understanding of classic Greek culture and
> geometry (but started with 'sets' and 'subsets' instead). 

I disagree. The parochial schools (at least in Oregon) are also showing 
declining test scores. As a parent I make it a habit to look through the 
text books to see what they are teaching - and as expected, the 
Revisionists have not only rewritten and deleted much of the relavent 
American and World history, but have watered down the math and science to 
the point or ludicracy in some cases. Let's face it, when Bill Nye the 
Science Guy is the most popular and the *most informative* science 
educational show on the mass media tube - we've got more than a little 
problem (For the Bill Nye fans - yes I do enjoy watching the show with my 
younger kids).

As a second oberservation, much of the yuppie/hippie generations dont 
seem to give a damn about what their kids are taught - but more that the 
grades are good and they qualify for the "right" schools. Many of these 
schools (college's) are finding that they have to teach the rudiments 
before moving onto what they would have taught first year had the kids 
come properly educated in the first place.

Having lived in a number of school districts (some better than others), 
the problem of parental non-participation and NEA interference is endemic 
at those institutions where my children have attended. I have even taken 
on teachers and adminstrators over the issues of lack of home work, why 
my children have *not* read literature such as Shakespeare, why they are 
not learning about the Founding Father's, why Columbus is considered 
politically incorrect, why they are not requiring Algebra prior to the 
Senior year in High School, why my children must be subject to 
"sensitivity training" as *part* of the curriculum, and the list goes on.

The US spends more money per child each year, but the level of education 
and necessary skill drilling keeps declining, being replaced by courses 
in sex education, diversity training, etc. - creating a class of state 
indoctrinated, functionally illiterate, non-competative individuals that 
think the goverment is mom and pop. 

As for the best and the brightest, they will only succeed if the parents 
take responsibility for managing their kid's education. I know Attila's 
kids personally, and just about any one of them is intellectually capable 
and educated enough to mop the floor with a majority of posters I have 
seen on this list. Why? Because he has spent years fostering their 
inquisitive nature and getting them to push themselves along - outside of 
and at the expense of the teachers' and administrators' sanity.

> 
> Science is still exploding in electro-physics, digital
> programming, molecular biology and several other fields.
> (I wonder what is happening in Pure Math with No Applications
> - not even for Cryptography :) - these days?) And formal
> education is gradually loosing to actual competence.
> 

Interesting point. More to the point, where is the innovation in the field 
coming from? Europe ? Asia? US? elsewhere?

> A real difference, though, is the relative lack of multidisciplinary
> theorists nowadays, I mean with a deep understanding of several
> 'unrelated' fields of knowledge. Most of us with actual competence
> in a certain area are SUBspecialists. This is natural since the
> knowledge bases have exploded to become impossible for any one man
> or woman to comprehend. An industrial cobol programmer probably
> doesn't know shit about Java (perhaps a bad example; I'm not
> a programmer, but I know a guy who makes a good living off cobol!)
> and a PCR biochemist hacking DNA doesn't know shit about immunology
> or molecular neurology. In bio-science there is a discipline
> which tries to put all such kinds of specialties into a broader
> understanding of the human/animal body and soul - it's called
> physiology, and is a declining field with chronic lack of funds;
> not much money in it. I'm sure there is a comparable discipline
> of computer science that I'm not able to name (information theory??),
> with similar economic problems. But there is still hope for the GMAU
> (Grand Meta-Analysis of the Universe); AltaVista is a new, good start
> for collecting ingredients :-)
> 

I will agree with you here. It has been said to me many times by Buisness 
types and Scientists that the days of the Generalist have long since 
died. One must specialize in order to survive. While there may be a 
certain amount of truth to that - it is a short sighted and disasterous 
claim at best, as it precludes the visonaries who understand the big 
picture and can collect, organize, and execute designs the push us 
forward with useful innovations.

> 
> So, I'm not worried. When I indulge in the inevitable bashing of
> younger generations I stick to their bade taste of music, like rap
> and hip-hop (but some acid house/techno is ok), and appearance, like
> tatoos and piercing, and life-style, like working-out, cliff-climbing
> and resorting to vitamins, herbal medicine and other useless stuff.
> (But even so, psychodelic drugs are making a come-back which I think
> is a Good Thing.)
> 
> 
> Asgaard (Gen 2)
> 

Every generation has their "rebellious" stage designe to piss off the 
"establishment". What I find amusing is that liberal parents are 
horrified when their kids, cut their hair, take an interest in education, 
economics and politics, and turn conservative as a result. :-)

...Paul