RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible

> [...]Having said this, Johnson noise makes a superior noise source,
> if a physical source is desired.
>
> --Tim May

Yours makes NOISE?  Impressive...

In this case, I guess entropy is preferable to atrophy, though.  :-)

Tunny
======================================================================
 James A. Tunnicliffe   | WWWeb: http://www.inference.com/~tunny
 Inference Corporation  | PGP Fingerprint:   CA 23 E2 F3 AC 2D 0C 77
 tunny@Inference.com    |                    36 07 D9 33 3D 32 53 9C
======================================================================

At 9:52 am -0500 12/3/96, James A. Tunnicliffe wrote:
> At 2:55 am -0500 12/3/96, Timothy C. May wrote:
>> [...]Having said this, Johnson noise makes a superior noise source,
                          ^^^^^^^
>> if a physical source is desired.
<snip>
>Yours makes NOISE?  Impressive...
>
>In this case, I guess entropy is preferable to atrophy, though.  :-)

Indeed.

I've found that my Johnson only makes noise with the proper, er,
peripheral, though...

Cheers,
Bob Hettinga
(whose .sig seems quite appropriate to cypherpunks today...)


-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com)
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"The cost of anything is the foregone alternative" -- Walter Johnson
The e$ Home Page: http://www.vmeng.com/rah/

Go here http://members.tripod.com/~wolf16