// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme

5 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 5662a6d5Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme
How about this simple policy scheme:

  1) posts from known list members forwarded to list automatically
  2) posts with "approval cookie" also forwarded automatically
  3) otherwise, forwarded only after approval by moderator, whose charter
	only permits spam filtering.

People who don't want to use their own name in a post, and also don't
want to be bothered with creating a cookie are the only ones whose posts
are delayed.
NODE 2955c00eRe: Modified Token Posting Scheme
ed.falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk) writes:

> How about this simple policy scheme:
>
>   1) posts from known list members forwarded to list automatically
>   2) posts with "approval cookie" also forwarded automatically
>   3) otherwise, forwarded only after approval by moderator,

I.e., libel from Timmy May, Ray Arachelian, and the rest of the gang
is approved automatically, and when a victim tries to defend himself
and to point out that Timmy May is a liar, the response is delayed
and probably rejected by the moderator.

It's been said that the best response to speech one doesn't like
is more speech. "Cypher punks" want to take away the victim's
ability to respond to the lies being posted on their mailing list.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
NODE f144930dRe: Modified Token Posting Scheme
On Mon, 6 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> ed.falk@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk) writes:
> 
> > How about this simple policy scheme:
> >
> >   1) posts from known list members forwarded to list automatically
> >   2) posts with "approval cookie" also forwarded automatically
> >   3) otherwise, forwarded only after approval by moderator,
> 
> I.e., libel from Timmy May, Ray Arachelian, and the rest of the gang
> is approved automatically, and when a victim tries to defend himself
> and to point out that Timmy May is a liar, the response is delayed
> and probably rejected by the moderator.
> 
> It's been said that the best response to speech one doesn't like
> is more speech. "Cypher punks" want to take away the victim's
> ability to respond to the lies being posted on their mailing list.

You are far from being the victim of anything.  If anything you're a big 
huge thug who spams the list, posts racist flames, posts homophobic 
flames, uses social engineering to find out info on his "enemies" and 
then posts that info online with requests that others send flames to that 
person's employers.

These are plain facts, and if anyone wants to verify them, all they need 
do is a net search on the word "Vulis"

Your only reason for bitching here is that your glorious spams will no 
longer be posted to the list which you've been kicked off of for abuse, 
and continue to abuse.



=====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos==============
.+.^.+.|  Ray Arachelian    | "If  you're  gonna die,  die  with your|./|\.
..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|boots on;  If you're  gonna  try,  just |/\|/\
<--*-->| ------------------ |stick around; Gonna cry? Just move along|\/|\/
../|\..| "A toast to Odin,  |you're gonna die, you're gonna die!"    |.\|/.
.+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|  --Iron Maiden "Die With Your Boots on"|.....
======================== http://www.sundernet.com =========================
NODE fc1de9bfRe: Modified Token Posting Scheme
Ray Arachelian wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 6 Jan 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> > I.e., libel from Timmy May, Ray Arachelian, and the rest of the gang
> > is approved automatically, and when a victim tries to defend himself
> > and to point out that Timmy May is a liar, the response is delayed
> > and probably rejected by the moderator.
> 
> You are far from being the victim of anything.  If anything you're a big
> huge thug who spams the list, posts racist flames, posts homophobic
> flames, uses social engineering to find out info on his "enemies" and
> then posts that info online with requests that others send flames to that
> person's employers.

  Yes, Ray, but he has his 'bad' side, too.
NODE 04e923e7Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme
Ed Falk wrote:

> People who don't want to use their own name in a post, and also don't
> want to be bothered with creating a cookie are the only ones whose posts
> are delayed.

  As well as people who fail to include their SIN and their mother's
maiden name. (for verification purposes only, of course)