NODE 2979079aFighting the cybercensor. (fwd)
Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 22:19:52 -0800 (PST)
Forwarded message:
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 13:50:15 -0500
> From: "Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
> Subject: Fighting the cybercensor.
>
> Singapore and China are blocking certain net groups. I think
> this is a bad thing, question is how can we stop it?
'We' shouldn't, it is their own country and it is up to their populace to
stop it. Do you really want Singapore or China having a say in how we run
our web? I certainly don't, and won't support any move to force any
particular view on them. If Billy-Bob wants to shoot himself in the foot,
let him. Might be purty funny to watch.
> The Web was conceived as offering despots and dictators a choice
> between remaining in the dark ages and allowing freedom of
> speech. Blocking and filtering schemes threaten this ideal.
Bull, the web was conceived so physicist and other researchers could share
data in a easily digestible format. The web and technology in general have
no more ethics or morality intrinsicly in them than a 5/8" open end
wrench. Blocking and filtering are an expression of human choice and the
implimentation thereof. You don't like it, don't live there and don't try to
call there. You or I have no more right to be on a Chinese or Singapore
Internet than they have in coming into yours or my home without an invitation.
Jim Choate
CyberTects
ravage@ssz.com
NODE b0d46d7aRe: Fighting the cybercensor. (fwd)
Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>Wed, 22 Jan 1997 02:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Jim Choate wrote:
> 'We' shouldn't, it is their own country and it is up to their populace to
> stop it. Do you really want Singapore or China having a say in how we run
> our web? I certainly don't, and won't support any move to force any
> particular view on them.
And Germany was Hitler and the Nazi Party's own country.
Do you really want Clinton and GingWretch having a say in how we run
our
web? (I don't).
It may be 'their' country ('their' being the government), but it is
'their' world ('their' being the people). There was a reason that the
Western powers didn't return East Germans who broke the laws of their
country by climbing over the wall and running for freedom.
Making information available does not 'force' a view on anyone.
> > The Web was conceived as offering despots and dictators a choice
> > between remaining in the dark ages and allowing freedom of
> > speech.
I want a couple of whatever this guy is on.
> Bull, the web was conceived so physicist and other researchers could share
> data in a easily digestible format.
No. The internet was conceived so that the DOD could monitor the
communications
of physicists and researchers who thought it was awfully nice of the
government
to provide this wonderful method of sharing data and information.
Toto