// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Last nail for US crypto export policy?

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 555f6827Re: Last nail for US crypto export policy?
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997 f_estema@alcor.concordia.ca wrote:
[stuff]
> 
> Incidentally, I remind you of the results of the moot court that was held 
> at one of the CFP conferences, where a GAK case was tried in front of 
> real federal judges by real lawyers. Our side lost.
> 

Um.  Actually the real judges didn't render an opinion (in public) since
they might have to rule for real someday and would probably be conflicted
out if they had ruled on the merits in a mock trial.  The opinions were by
a shadow panel of law professors, and they disagreed, 2-1. 
==
The above may have been dictated via Dragon Dictate 2.51 voice
recognition. Please be alert for unintentional word substitutions. 

A. Michael Froomkin        | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law |
U. Miami School of Law     | froomkin@law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087            | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.
NODE 401c15d0Re: Last nail for US crypto export policy?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu> writes:
<snip>
> The above may have been dictated via Dragon Dictate 2.51 voice
> recognition. Please be alert for unintentional word substitutions. 

Stego? Maybe 3 bits per substituted word? Good bye, uhnsufride, hello,
"speech recognition."

Jer

"standing on top of the world/ never knew how you never could/ never knew
 why you never could live/ innocent life that everyone did" -Wormhole

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQB1AwUBMvDlzMkz/YzIV3P5AQExTAL/d5/Bd7hrwi6zWAsHTm+W8j072sQVtVjx
kkFbxf5oBYObYScT8h57PZlZcobumV3I8sjAguPVBeBC9uMIiKDd8H0xh5w0Ncr5
EcIsRwmpn/6rXutrUO1IUVTnepCJq6gn
=iACw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----