NODE 57ecfaa8WinKrypt
Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>Sun, 26 Jan 1997 18:26:57 -0800 (PST)
Out of curiosity, is anyone familiar with WinKrypt by Syncronsys?
I picked up a copy & there is no mention in the documentation which
encryption algorithm it uses & what the key lengths are. FWIW, my
impression is that the documentation seems to deliberately avoid
mentioning the algorithm/key lengths. Hmmmm. (food for thought)
I was curious how it compares to McAfee's PC Crypto which uses
40-bit DES or 160-bit Blowfish (user-chooses) & other PC/laptop
encryption products. BTW, I would also appreciate your input
on any crypto products which you believe to be robust, easy-to-use
& secure. (I know I can only have 2 out of 3, but it's worth a try
anyway). 8^)
Please send marketing info to me directly at: frankw@in.net and
**NOT** to the entire mailing list.
(BTW, I mentioned WinKrypt & PCcrypo because they are the only
two which are available at many computer stores as COTS s/w).
TIA for your help.
Best Regards,
Frank
NODE 6d591d3aRe: WinKrypt
gt@kdn0.attnet.or.jp (Gemini Thunder)Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Thus sprach Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>:
>Out of curiosity, is anyone familiar with WinKrypt by Syncronsys?
Syncronsys [sp?] Software is the maker of SoftRam95, a program that
supposedly doubled your memory through memory compression and other
quasi-magical means. It was later revealed that not only did it not
work as advertised, but it actually did not do anything at all
(except display graphs indicating non-existant improvements). IIRC,
they lost a class action suit over this issue.
I would trust an encryption program relased to the public by the NSA
more than anything these charlatans released.
[snip]
>I was curious how it compares to McAfee's PC Crypto which uses
>40-bit DES or 160-bit Blowfish (user-chooses) & other PC/laptop
>encryption products. BTW, I would also appreciate your input
>on any crypto products which you believe to be robust, easy-to-use
>& secure. (I know I can only have 2 out of 3, but it's worth a try
>anyway). 8^)
I consider PGP to be robust, easy-to-use (with some front-end
assistance), and secure. However, I am by no means an authority on
crypto.
__________
- 2[b]||!2[b] /* What's the question? It's a tautology! */
- 0x2B|!0x2B /* == FFFFFFFF */