NODE b5385de4Jim Choate Speaks Out on My Part of the Net (fwd)
Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:05:23 -0800 (PST)
Forwarded message:
> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:07:57 -0800
> From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
> Subject: Jim Choate Speaks Out on My Part of the Net
>
> Jim Choate wrote:
> > If you really and truly believe that the net belongs to everyone and nobody
> > has a right to limit or otherwise control the hardware and software along
> > with the associated comm links they own and pay for then you obviously don't
> > understand what is going on.
> > For instance, since Toto pays for the hardware and software that comprises
> > his part of the net, he is free to limit, control, and edit for content,
> > anything that passes through his part of the net.
> > Although I sometimes disagree with Toto because of my limited ability to
> > understand things on a conceptual level, his rugged good looks, charm,
> > and superior intelligence show that he should be allowed to control his
> > own privately owned part of the net and anything that passes through it.
>
> > Jim Choate
> > CyberTects
> > ravage@ssz.com
>
> Jim,
> Thank you for your support in my efforts to exert supreme control over
> the part of the net that I have paid for.
> I am sure that you will continue to fight for the right of myself and
> the government of Singapore to use that control for whatever purpose
> they choose.
> As you can see above, I have enhanced your posting so that it more
> closely conforms to the beliefs that my paid-for part of the net was
> set up to espouse.
Are you aware that attributing statements in print to a party when that
party did not write them is a crime?
Jim Choate
CyberTects
ravage@ssz.com
NODE 70c88162Re: Jim Choate Speaks Out on My Part of the Net (fwd)
ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:14:49 -0800 (PST)
Jim Choate wrote:
>
>
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:07:57 -0800
> > From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
> > Subject: Jim Choate Speaks Out on My Part of the Net
> >
> > Jim Choate wrote:
>
> > > If you really and truly believe that the net belongs to everyone and nobody
> > > has a right to limit or otherwise control the hardware and software along
> > > with the associated comm links they own and pay for then you obviously don't
> > > understand what is going on.
>
> > > For instance, since Toto pays for the hardware and software that comprises
> > > his part of the net, he is free to limit, control, and edit for content,
> > > anything that passes through his part of the net.
> > > Although I sometimes disagree with Toto because of my limited ability to
> > > understand things on a conceptual level, his rugged good looks, charm,
> > > and superior intelligence show that he should be allowed to control his
> > > own privately owned part of the net and anything that passes through it.
> >
> > > Jim Choate
> > > CyberTects
> > > ravage@ssz.com
> >
> > Jim,
> > Thank you for your support in my efforts to exert supreme control over
> > the part of the net that I have paid for.
> > I am sure that you will continue to fight for the right of myself and
> > the government of Singapore to use that control for whatever purpose
> > they choose.
> > As you can see above, I have enhanced your posting so that it more
> > closely conforms to the beliefs that my paid-for part of the net was
> > set up to espouse.
>
> Are you aware that attributing statements in print to a party when that
> party did not write them is a crime?
cite the statute
- Igor.