// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks "moderation" experim

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 824b7003Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks "moderation" experim
On or About  5 Jan 97 at 22:38, Black Unicorn wrote:

> Excellent until the flames list is eliminated.

Yes I want to read this list, flames and all.  I guess I'm just used
to it by now.  I don't filter it myself (except manually) so I don't
want to trust someone I don't know to do it.

Ross

=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ross Wright
King Media: Bulk Sales of Software Media and Duplication Services
http://www.slip.net/~cdr/kingmedia
Voice: 415-206-9906
NODE 870b4d99Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks "moderation" experim
Ross Wright wrote:
> On or About  5 Jan 97 at 22:38, Black Unicorn wrote:
> > Excellent until the flames list is eliminated.

> Yes I want to read this list, flames and all.  I guess I'm just used
> to it by now.  I don't filter it myself (except manually) so I don't
> want to trust someone I don't know to do it.

Just one other thing, Ross.  Don't assume that the stated purpose and
the real purpose are one and the same.
NODE df9ecf62Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks "moderation" experim
Ross Wright wrote:
 
> Yes I want to read this list, flames and all.  I guess I'm just used
> to it by now.  I don't filter it myself (except manually) so I don't
> want to trust someone I don't know to do it.

  Part of the problem I see is that there are a fair number of postings
that include traded insults, but which also contain some excellent
commentary and/or information.

  Perhaps much of the spamming/flaming could be curtailed by John
Gilmore announcing that he has stopped sucking cocks. <g>
  (Or am I 'unclear on the concept', here?)

Toto