4 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child
On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > i agree with dale thorn that you are sandy sandfort. > > igor Believe what you will. You only prove the old saying that goes simply, "People are stupid." Exactly why, aside from the obvious unwarranted and inaccurate assumption, is left as an exercise to the reader. Think of it as an intelligence test.
aidas@ixsrs4.ix.netcom.com wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > > i agree with dale thorn that you are sandy sandfort. > > > > igor > > Believe what you will. > > You only prove the old saying that goes simply, "People are stupid." > Exactly why, aside from the obvious unwarranted and inaccurate assumption, > is left as an exercise to the reader. Think of it as an intelligence test. My wild guess is, you wanted to say that I am stupid. You think that my stupidity implies that people are stupid. OK. AIDAS will disappear next day, but Sandy will not. I would love to hear Sandy's statement as to whether AIDAS is Sandy Sandfort or not. If Sandy says no, I will believe him, because his reputation has a longer time span than AIDAS's. In case Sandy says that AIDAS is not him, I will publicly retract my statement, which by the way I made to AIDAS privately (I have no idea why he posted it to the mailing list, although I do not really mind). If Sandy chooses not to comment, I will understand. - Igor.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Sun, 19 Jan 1997 ichudov@algebra.com wrote:
> I would love to hear Sandy's statement as to whether AIDAS is Sandy
> Sandfort or not. If Sandy says no, I will believe him, because his
> reputation has a longer time span than AIDAS's.
>
> In case Sandy says that AIDAS is not him, I will publicly retract my
> statement, which by the way I made to AIDAS privately (I have no idea
> why he posted it to the mailing list, although I do not really mind).
Normally, I would not comment one way or the other on this sort
of thing. We have a whole alphabet soup of aliases out there and
I don't intend to waste time with denials. Heck, it helps keep
an air of mystery about the list. But Igor has been a fair and
reasoned contributor to this list, so as a personal favor I will
admit that I AM NOT AIDAS. Sorry, but that's the truth.
S a n d y
P.S. I'm not Igor either.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~alright, i retract my statement. Thank you, Sandy. igor Sandy Sandfort wrote: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > SANDY SANDFORT > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > C'punks, > > On Sun, 19 Jan 1997 ichudov@algebra.com wrote: > > > I would love to hear Sandy's statement as to whether AIDAS is Sandy > > Sandfort or not. If Sandy says no, I will believe him, because his > > reputation has a longer time span than AIDAS's. > > > > In case Sandy says that AIDAS is not him, I will publicly retract my > > statement, which by the way I made to AIDAS privately (I have no idea > > why he posted it to the mailing list, although I do not really mind). > > Normally, I would not comment one way or the other on this sort > of thing. We have a whole alphabet soup of aliases out there and > I don't intend to waste time with denials. Heck, it helps keep > an air of mystery about the list. But Igor has been a fair and > reasoned contributor to this list, so as a personal favor I will > admit that I AM NOT AIDAS. Sorry, but that's the truth. > > > S a n d y > > P.S. I'm not Igor either. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > - Igor.