NODE 338c6ad7Re: lead remailer is shut down
bs-org@c2.netFri, 7 Feb 1997 16:56:23 -0800 (PST)
At 11:58 1997-02-07 -0800, Ed Falk wrote:
>
>Can't remailers be written with basic spam safeguards? I.e. no mass
>crossposts, limited # of posts by each individual client per day, etc.?
Can anybody give me the address of reliable remailer which accepts
pgp messages.
BTW which remailer was shut down and why?
NODE 9d607f04Re: lead remailer is shut down
Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>Fri, 7 Feb 1997 21:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Raph's remailer list is at
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~raph/remailer-list.html
and indicates lots of different remailer features,
including whether they accept or require PGP,
and what reliability they've been getting recently.
The remailer that was shut down was the remailer named "lead";
you may have noticed that your reply went to a machine named "zinc".....
At 11:56 PM 2/7/97 +0100, you wrote:
>Can anybody give me the address of reliable remailer which accepts
>pgp messages.
>
>BTW which remailer was shut down and why?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
# (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)