NODE 7fb263f7Re: mail-to-news fun
"Scott V. McGuire" <svmcguir@syr.edu>Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:21:19 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 5 Feb 1997 stewarts@ix.netcom.com wrote:
...snip...
> If I were going to restart a remailer, and to offer news posting,
> I'd probably limit it to posting to moderated newsgroups only,
> so a human can trash things that look like SPAM or abuse;
> the abuse that caused me to kill my remailer wasn't something
> a simple filter would catch. (I'd also prefix each posting with a
> header about this message having been received from an anonymous source,
> not verified, not guaranteed to be worth the electrons it's printed on,
> probably not written by anybody whose name's at the bottom, etc....
> People don't read mail headers or disclaimers at the bottom,
> and putting disclaimers like that into message text for
> email exposes the message to traffic analysis.)
How does putting it in the message expose it to traffic analysis but not
putting it in a header?
>
...snip...
>
> # Thanks; Bill
> # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
> # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
> # (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)
>
--------------------
Scott V. McGuire <svmcguir@syr.edu>
PGP key available at http://web.syr.edu/~svmcguir
Key fingerprint = 86 B1 10 3F 4E 48 75 0E 96 9B 1E 52 8B B1 26 05
NODE 1b5657d6Re: mail-to-news fun
Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>Thu, 6 Feb 1997 16:07:34 -0800 (PST)
At 01:01 PM 2/6/97 -0500, Scott V. McGuire wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Feb 1997 stewarts@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> People don't read mail headers or disclaimers at the bottom,
>> and putting disclaimers like that into message text for
>> email exposes the message to traffic analysis.)
>How does putting it in the message expose it to traffic analysis but not
>putting it in a header?
Suppose you're sending a message on a remailer chain of
you -> Alice->Bob->Charlie->Dave->Eve->Fred--> target
and Bob puts lots of disclaimers in his remailer's outgoing messages.
Anything Bob puts in a header will get stripped out by Charlie,
so it's no problem. However, if Bob tacks a disclaimer
as the bottom text in the outgoing message, when Eve sends
mail to Fred she'll also see the disclaimer that
The message was sent by an anonymous user
through the remailer at Bob's Remailer Shack.
Bob doesn't know who sent it, and doesn't keep records,
so he can't squash the user, but he can block mail to you
if you don't want any more anonymous email.
Don't believe everything you read!
so she'll know to check the FBI Illegal Wiretap files for Bob.
Some comments and backtracking
0) Of course, if you want to avoid traffic analysis,
sending unencrypted email is pretty stupid, and only the
next hop is going to see a disclaimer that you append
after the encrypted part of the message.
1) Prepending the disclaimer to the message body is
pretty unfriendly to the :: syntax, and not all that
great for PGP encrypted messages either. Pretend I
really just suggested appending it at the end,
since that's what I would have said if I'd been thinking :-)
On the other hand, I suppose that you can see whether the
next hop is a Type I remailer by looking for the :: or ##.
2) Cutmarks would be a nice fix, but they require too much
attention to detail to get right, in case the next hop
is a remailer.
So maybe you _should_ always put in the disclaimer,
at the end, with a reminder to always encrypt your
remailer-chain mail if you want to avoid traffic analysis :-)
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
# (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)
NODE 4199321eRe: mail-to-news fun
Lance Cottrell <loki@infonex.com>Thu, 6 Feb 1997 20:01:51 -0800 (PST)
It would be a trivial hack for Mixmaster. It allways knows if a message if
going to another remailer, or if this is the last hop, so it can add the
disclaimer only on the last hop.
-Lance
At 4:06 PM -0800 2/6/97, Bill Stewart wrote:
>At 01:01 PM 2/6/97 -0500, Scott V. McGuire wrote:
>>On Wed, 5 Feb 1997 stewarts@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>>> People don't read mail headers or disclaimers at the bottom,
>>> and putting disclaimers like that into message text for
>>> email exposes the message to traffic analysis.)
>
>>How does putting it in the message expose it to traffic analysis but not
>>putting it in a header?
>
>Suppose you're sending a message on a remailer chain of
>you -> Alice->Bob->Charlie->Dave->Eve->Fred--> target
>and Bob puts lots of disclaimers in his remailer's outgoing messages.
>Anything Bob puts in a header will get stripped out by Charlie,
>so it's no problem. However, if Bob tacks a disclaimer
>as the bottom text in the outgoing message, when Eve sends
>mail to Fred she'll also see the disclaimer that
> The message was sent by an anonymous user
> through the remailer at Bob's Remailer Shack.
> Bob doesn't know who sent it, and doesn't keep records,
> so he can't squash the user, but he can block mail to you
> if you don't want any more anonymous email.
> Don't believe everything you read!
>so she'll know to check the FBI Illegal Wiretap files for Bob.
>
>Some comments and backtracking
>0) Of course, if you want to avoid traffic analysis,
>sending unencrypted email is pretty stupid, and only the
>next hop is going to see a disclaimer that you append
>after the encrypted part of the message.
>
>1) Prepending the disclaimer to the message body is
>pretty unfriendly to the :: syntax, and not all that
>great for PGP encrypted messages either. Pretend I
>really just suggested appending it at the end,
>since that's what I would have said if I'd been thinking :-)
>
>On the other hand, I suppose that you can see whether the
>next hop is a Type I remailer by looking for the :: or ##.
>
>2) Cutmarks would be a nice fix, but they require too much
>attention to detail to get right, in case the next hop
>is a remailer.
>
>So maybe you _should_ always put in the disclaimer,
>at the end, with a reminder to always encrypt your
>remailer-chain mail if you want to avoid traffic analysis :-)
>
>
>
>
>
># Thanks; Bill
># Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
># You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
># (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)
----------------------------------------------------------
Lance Cottrell loki@obscura.com
PGP 2.6 key available by finger or server.
http://www.obscura.com/~loki/
"Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly
it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night the ice
weasels come."
--Nietzsche
----------------------------------------------------------