Re: Senate spams

Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> writes:
> Personally I think you're allowing the bad feeling generated by the
> [CENSORED] PR goofup over Dimitri's false criticisms to cloud your
> usually good judgement.

Adam, before labeling my criticisms "false", have you examined the
source code of the product in quesion to see if it's secure?

So far, the people caught making false statements are Sameer Parekh
(spit) and his lackeys Greg Broils (spit) and Sandy Sandfart (spit).

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

Dimitri Vulis <dlv@bwalk.dm.com> writes:
> Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk> writes:
> > Personally I think you're allowing the bad feeling generated by the
> > [CENSORED] PR goofup over Dimitri's false criticisms to cloud your
> > usually good judgement.
> 
> Adam, before labeling my criticisms "false", have you examined the
> source code of the product in quesion to see if it's secure?

Well I have looked at SSLeay, and Ben Laurie's apache-SSL module which
is what StrongHold is based on, but not in any great detail, so I
shouldn't comment one way or another.

If you are suggesting there is a flaw, perhaps you could give some
hints on what the alleged flaw is, so that I could stand a chance of
refuting or confirming your claim, and so that if there is a flaw, it
can be fixed?

I, and I think many others, took your claim to be a PSYOP attempt to
cause a dilemma for Sandy.  If you really did find a flaw, well, lets
here it.  C2Net would owe you an apology.

Adam
--
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`