NODE 38cb74c2Re: New X-Ray Imager
ichudov@algebra.comTue, 4 Feb 1997 11:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Lucky Green wrote:
> At 10:38 AM 2/4/97 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
> >| A poll last week by the Los Angeles Times found that a majority of
> people --
> >| 58 percent -- said they would curtail some civil liberties if it would help
> >| thwart terrorism. Thirteen percent said it would depend on what rights were
> >| at stake. The poll didn't ask people to single out any rights.
> >
> > Its worth noting the 'if it would help thwart terrorism.'
>
> It is irrelevant if terrorism is indeed be thwarted. The public does not
> require this to happen. All that matters is to generate the *perception* of
> increased security, not to increase security itself.
Let's remember though that perception of security applies not
only to passengers, but also to potential terrorists. If they *think*
that they would not be able to bring a bomb easily, they would be less
inclined to do so.
- Igor.
NODE d726c9a8Re: New X-Ray Imager
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>Tue, 4 Feb 1997 14:47:00 -0800 (PST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <199702041941.LAA04346@toad.com>, on 02/04/97 at 01:19 PM,
ichudov@algebra.com said:
>Lucky Green wrote:
>> At 10:38 AM 2/4/97 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
>> >| A poll last week by the Los Angeles Times found that a majority of
>> people --
>> >| 58 percent -- said they would curtail some civil liberties if it would help
>> >| thwart terrorism. Thirteen percent said it would depend on what rights were
>> >| at stake. The poll didn't ask people to single out any rights.
>> >
>> > Its worth noting the 'if it would help thwart terrorism.'
>>
>> It is irrelevant if terrorism is indeed be thwarted. The public does not
>> require this to happen. All that matters is to generate the *perception* of
>> increased security, not to increase security itself.
>Let's remember though that perception of security applies not only to
>passengers, but also to potential terrorists. If they *think* that they
>would not be able to bring a bomb easily, they would be less inclined to
>do so.
Not really,
The thin vail of "security" that the goverment provides may be good enough
to give warm-fuzzies to the avarage sheep, ...er citizen, but the potential
terrorists will see it for what it is.
- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
Finger whgiii@amaranth.com for PGP Key and other info
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: OS/2...Opens up Windows, shuts up Gates.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Registered User E-Secure v1.1 0000000
iQCVAwUBMve/So9Co1n+aLhhAQFZqQQAkIt/8pUqBWagohj2GkbpnFBKOqAkziqk
Y/KINK0yk2ylBVUM7OtL+nfSis6dQ09t+Y5WhgQcaYE8rUaYYS+qxmaJdsqg2X92
L/ISf363fPzD8KvvP+3+xQBv5r5VBnSFahAhhT4NmArOdeLEc5tGl4GCt09gDjdI
y9iVNcrNxFk=
=nu7P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----