Which list am I on?

I thought I was on the cypherpunks edited list.  However, I appear to
have seen some of the messages that Tim says got lost.  Moreover, I
keep getting ASCII art messages flaming someone with the initials DLV
(though I haven't seen any more of the TCM flames [I haven't looked
too hard, either]).  My mail headers have:

>From cypherpunks-errors@toad.com  <date>
>Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com

Now I'm really confused.  Which list am I on?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    antimod (nym):

    no way to tell what list your receiving from; the software Sandy 
    and John installed to facilitate their un-American activities is 
    hosed.  in most cases it fails to apply the correct sender name,
    defaulting to the main, supposedly censored list.

        -attila

on or about 970207:0930 Against Moderation <antimod@nym.alias.net> said:

+I thought I was on the cypherpunks edited list.  However, I appear to
+have seen some of the messages that Tim says got lost.  Moreover, I
+keep getting ASCII art messages flaming someone with the initials DLV
+(though I haven't seen any more of the TCM flames [I haven't looked too
+hard, either]).  My mail headers have:

+>From cypherpunks-errors@toad.com  <date>
+>Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com

+Now I'm really confused.  Which list am I on?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
Comment: No safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be

iQCVAwUBMvt0Tb04kQrCC2kFAQHU3wP+IJE5n2Ypp6WLgxIHX1u0YfFah6fNP+Pz
UmToaW0C+mVZLM9S7VpBjwhiyqFCWWpZMbrqAnpkU9/yGCnHnhfjZ1P8I9SZZc0n
FmcomIS5BwcDC+Zd+5t4YeOOhqHZPDlqKMsZ/UuKfOeQainfedlvTmNJI2fIqTsy
t9jLSuDKWEE=
=s+Wc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Fri, 7 Feb 1997, Attila T. Hun wrote:

>     no way to tell what list your receiving from; the software Sandy 
>     and John installed to facilitate their un-American activities is 
>     hosed.  in most cases it fails to apply the correct sender name,
>     defaulting to the main, supposedly censored list.

That's why we call it a test.  I have no software.  Everything
I'm doing is manual.  Whatever John has done is probably jerry
rigged just for the test.  

If list members opt for moderation, more effort will be put into
the moderation infrastructure.  The idea right now is to see how
well a first aproximation of moderation works.  If it seems like
a step in the right direction, great.  If everyone thinks it
sucks, well that's great too.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~