// COMPLETE THREAD

Remailers: Free vs. Fee

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 789cd53cRemailers: Free vs. Fee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

A question for those legally-minded list members.

Poorly put:

Does the requirement an individual pay a fee (or the acceptance of a fee) for
remailing services create a liability on the part of the remailer in regard
to the content of the message?

Or, if the service is free does the remailer have less risk than if he
charged for it?

Alec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.5

iQCVAgUBMzRiyyKJGkNBIH7lAQHaxwP/Z73JUcG9qqS2cvvSGzforGEWstlRUv8v
N9p6XUmoYoR2wo+D2wzmWsI8suIPGOwBHV5aKAds/tfJtzoPEQ7iEszREBpK1afT
6/D+KtEo1+Q0NNC8eatiJELvwqGUBBjzRXL1QP95fMQXoP0Gk70HjFZegLYWw7Fx
FSUS/XKny/g=
=sdLH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 540af236Re: Remailers: Free vs. Fee
At 5:53 PM -0500 3/22/97, Alec wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>A question for those legally-minded list members.
>
>Poorly put:
>
>Does the requirement an individual pay a fee (or the acceptance of a fee) for
>remailing services create a liability on the part of the remailer in regard
>to the content of the message?
>
>Or, if the service is free does the remailer have less risk than if he
>charged for it?

Have you been skipping the messages from Greg Broiles on this very topic?

I suggest you dig up his messages and read them.

--Tim May

Just say "No" to "Big Brother Inside"
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269     | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."