NODE 48b41febRe: Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats
John Young <jya@pipeline.com>Fri, 4 Apr 1997 10:49:53 -0800 (PST)
On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP:
Virtually all of Phil's charges against AP apply equally well to
state-sponsored killing in the natonal interest, including that
arranged by highly educated, cultured, philosophical, nuclear
physicists and electrical engineers.
That's the issue. Who gets to decide who lives and who dies, and
how close the killer is to the slaughter, unprotected by law, by
public consensus, by popular will, by apologetics for the security
of national interest.
Jim Bell is hardly the first to articulate this challenge to the grand
tradition of the majestic state and its precursors -- the king, the
bandit, the tribal bully, the strong -- all sanctioned beasts taking what
their trainers want by force, while being excused and celebrated by
fey intellectuals and balladeers of all craven submissive dress.
Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not
closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs
of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these
days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
NODE ad50edceRe: Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>Fri, 4 Apr 1997 12:50:37 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, Apr 04, 1997 at 01:41:38PM -0500, John Young wrote:
> On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP:
[...]
> Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not
> closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs
> of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these
> days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
Crispin shills for himself, not the NLs or any bandits or anyone else.
Phil Hallam-Baker shills for Phil Hallam-Baker. Jim Bell's advocacy
of armed thuggery speaks for itself.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
NODE ea00e324I hope thr IRA nails Hallam-Baker...
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Fri, 4 Apr 1997 16:27:56 -0800 (PST)
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 1997 at 01:41:38PM -0500, John Young wrote:
> > On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP:
> [...]
>
> > Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not
> > closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs
> > of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these
> > days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
>
> Crispin shills for himself, not the NLs or any bandits or anyone else.
> Phil Hallam-Baker shills for Phil Hallam-Baker. Jim Bell's advocacy
> of armed thuggery speaks for itself.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
> kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
> PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
> http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
I just noticed how when I first called Cocksucker John Gilmore an
NSA shill (which he is), some people didnb't know what the fuck it
was, but now everyone's accusing everyone else of shilling.
How can one donate money to rthe IRA anyway?
Hallam baker convinced me to.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps