Kent Crispin-Baker

Kent Crispin wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 07, 1997 at 07:24:03PM -0600, Toto wrote:
> > Kent Crispin wrote:
> > >
> > > In fact, a case could be made for
> > > considering Jim Bell as a NSA shill. 

> >   So, now Kent is volunteering to testify to the fact that Jim Bell is
> > an NSA shill. (and still seems ashamed of his .gov address)
 
> Just so you know, Toto, .gov informs me it doesn't want there to be
> the slightest possibility of anyone thinking I am speaking for it.

  Amazing that they notified you right after I made note
of it, isn't it?
 
> And the part about Jim Bell being an NSA shill? I am not volunteering
> to testify to anything, but your are the *second* person to say
> something about it, so it *must* be true.  And the part about the
> statist agenda?  That must be true too, since you quoted it.

  I think that they are confusing you with Hallam-Baker, who
offered to testify against Bell in court.
  This is an understandable error, since even a modicum of
traffic analysis shows that you work in concert with one
another.
 

> --
> Kent Crispin      
> kent@songbird.com 
  [ And, lest we forget: kc@llnl.gov ]

TruthMonger



************************************************************************
 This Anonymous email has been relayed by http://www.MyEmail.net/
 MyEmail.Net is a free anonymous mailing service. No records indicating
 the identity of person(s) who originated this message are retrieved
 electronically, or as a requirement to submit. Your email address can
 be blocked to prevent further contact from this service, please refer
 to the URL above for instructions on how to do so.
************************************************************************

On Tue, Apr 08, 1997 at 04:10:04PM -0500, null@myemail.net wrote:
> Kent Crispin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 1997 at 07:24:03PM -0600, Toto wrote:
> > >   So, now Kent is volunteering to testify to the fact that Jim Bell is
> > > an NSA shill. (and still seems ashamed of his .gov address)
> >
> > Just so you know, Toto, .gov informs me it doesn't want there to be
> > the slightest possibility of anyone thinking I am speaking for it.
> >
>
> Amazing that they notified you right after I made note
> of it, isn't it?

No, they notified me years ago.  The fact that it was noticed on this 
list reminded me that I had been lax.

Just to be absolutely clear on this, everything you see from me is my 
personal opinion.  I do not speak for any government agency.

> > And the part about Jim Bell being an NSA shill? I am not volunteering
> > to testify to anything, but your are the *second* person to say
> > something about it, so it *must* be true.  And the part about the
> > statist agenda?  That must be true too, since you quoted it.
> 
>   I think that they are confusing you with Hallam-Baker, who
> offered to testify against Bell in court.
>   This is an understandable error, since even a modicum of
> traffic analysis shows that you work in concert with one
> another.

Ask me if I care.

-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com			the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44  61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html