NODE ff195b95Garbled in transmission.
"ET" <emergent@eval-apply.com>Sat, 21 Jun 1997 08:16:47 +0800
I caught the Headline News mention of the DES crack and it
unfortunately put the wrong spin on things.
I can't remember it word for word, but it went like this:
"If you're going to decrypt financial transactions you'd better
be prepared to get 1000 computers and spend 3 months on
the project."
The report was delivered with a hint of a smile, as if to suggest
that the time and resources might have been better spent.
*Sigh*
NODE 0aba165cRe: Garbled in transmission.
Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com>Mon, 23 Jun 1997 23:52:11 +0800
At 8:05 PM -0400 6/20/97, ET wrote:
>I caught the Headline News mention of the DES crack and it
>unfortunately put the wrong spin on things.
>
>I can't remember it word for word, but it went like this:
>"If you're going to decrypt financial transactions you'd better
>be prepared to get 1000 computers and spend 3 months on
>the project."
At least Harry Houdini made it look easy when *he* cracked state of the art
security technology...
Rick.
smith@securecomputing.com secure computing corporation
"Internet Cryptography" soon in print http://www.visi.com/crypto/
NODE 4c57ec37"Strength of encryption standard proved again"
Tim May <tcmay@got.net>Sat, 21 Jun 1997 08:45:29 +0800
( cryptography@c2.net removed from the distribution list, as I am not a
subscriber to that list, and Perry has admonished me when I have
accidentally left his list on the cc: to my messages)
Reuter (Washington, Friday), Security experts reported today that the
nation's encryption standard, "DES," has been proved to be secure. "It took
more than 1000 computers working for 3 months before a single "toy example"
was finally found, " reported Murray Bowdark, Director of the Computer
Security Association, Ft. Meade, Maryland.
"This shows that even a concerted effort by thousands of hackers will take
months," said Bowdark. "And since hacking like this is outlawed by new
legislation just passed by Congress, this makes "cracking DES" about as
improbable as proving that the CIA imported drugs."
(OK, I confess. Not a real press release. But, as ET notes below in his
article, the spin doctors are already drawing the conclusion that many of
us expected they would draw: by using the crack to prove that this means
DES is resistant against thousands of computers running for months. And to
tell the truth, were I less aware of some of the issues surrounding
hardware-based DES-crackers, I admit that this report would tend to leave
me with this impression. I can imagine most of our parents would look up
from the CNN report on this and say, if they said anything, "OK, so my bank
account is pretty secure.")
At 5:05 PM -0700 6/20/97, ET wrote:
>I caught the Headline News mention of the DES crack and it
>unfortunately put the wrong spin on things.
>
>I can't remember it word for word, but it went like this:
>"If you're going to decrypt financial transactions you'd better
>be prepared to get 1000 computers and spend 3 months on
>the project."
>
>The report was delivered with a hint of a smile, as if to suggest
>that the time and resources might have been better spent.
>
>*Sigh*
There's something wrong when I'm a felon under an increasing number of laws.
Only one response to the key grabbers is warranted: "Death to Tyrants!"
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
NODE 39000d86Re: Garbled in transmission.
sameer <sameer@c2.net>Sat, 21 Jun 1997 10:25:27 +0800
Not at all surprising, considering the wording of Rocke's
press release.
> I caught the Headline News mention of the DES crack and it
> unfortunately put the wrong spin on things.
>
> I can't remember it word for word, but it went like this:
> "If you're going to decrypt financial transactions you'd better
> be prepared to get 1000 computers and spend 3 months on
> the project."
>
> The report was delivered with a hint of a smile, as if to suggest
> that the time and resources might have been better spent.
>
> *Sigh*
>
>
--
Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770
President FAX: 510-986-8777
C2Net
http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net
NODE fb848f95Re: Garbled in transmission.
Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>Sun, 22 Jun 1997 01:42:29 +0800
> Not at all surprising, considering the wording of Rocke's
> press release.
On the other hand, had the news report been based on any of your own
releases, they would have had to include subliminal messages than C2Net
is a trusted company and Sameer is god, and that StrongHold does not
contain any backdoors.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
NODE aecb25adRe: Garbled in transmission.
C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com>Sun, 22 Jun 1997 08:21:42 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "sameer" == sameer <sameer@c2.net> writes:
sameer> Not at all surprising, considering the wording of
sameer> Rocke's press release.
Surely you refer to the lack of a commercial spin in Rocke's press
release. Or maybe we should have also sung the praises of C2Net's
"uncompromised Internet security software"?
The crack of the DES Challenge Key is important. Presenting an
accurate description of what happened is just as important. There is
no need to cause widespread panic, yet. This is a shot across the
proverbial bow.
Trying to present it to the public at large is a difficult
proposition, and not something that can easily be covered in the sorts
of soundbyte-driven news reports seen on shows like Headline News. I
know, I've been trying to talk about the meaning of DESCHALL to
business managers and Regular People for more than three months.
What we should be doing is encouraging discussion of the meaning and
significance of what we've done, the sort of thing that will lead to
the kinds of in-depth reports that will accurately tell Joe Citizen
exactly what all of this means.
- -matt
>> I caught the Headline News mention of the DES crack and it
>> unfortunately put the wrong spin on things.
>>
>> I can't remember it word for word, but it went like this: "If
>> you're going to decrypt financial transactions you'd better be
>> prepared to get 1000 computers and spend 3 months on the project."
>>
>> The report was delivered with a hint of a smile, as if to suggest
>> that the time and resources might have been better spent.
>>
>> *Sigh*
>>
>>
sameer> -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770 President FAX:
sameer> 510-986-8777 C2Net http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net
- --
Matt Curtin Chief Scientist Megasoft Online cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com
http://www.research.megasoft.com/people/cmcurtin/ I speak only for myself
Pull AGIS.NET's plug! DES has fallen! http://www.frii.com/~rcv/deschall.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Have you encrypted your data today?
iQEVAwUBM6xtTn6R34u/f3zNAQEq3Qf+IjX54s2tLK8IqUzVlk9TYtTsgyvK0cZG
hlNHKhqS/Ps7+P3bqiAajl8aSYot1JEZP0IWVXMFScJ3YJMWjUQqLCWJxzHG/bM9
iVSeZ7C4jJu82Hc3Ojogel4rO0tQTkcmdImNZhKzHUjEO0hGcftSO6AkhKbgpyIz
FNEG0+L0hHvSc58fFhjeIM9Z8Lo9ft6ibXYQfCMgO8Nq9ITG9ADvWXIskAYZKLyG
wrjxjaQaUtAMpHpC452JvkGFQE5x5HF6n2p1ifh7C7G3JUlB9Aci/WJtkz9vZEf3
bXLLjw68p3RrstZ48ZT6Zq62GU72Sua97URz7Xyz1be2ZkyMPySRWw==
=ro2d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE a5f1d451Re: Garbled in transmission.
"\"RC5 Crackhead\"" <rc5@dev.null>Sun, 22 Jun 1997 12:49:59 +0800
C Matthew Curtin wrote:
> The crack of the DES Challenge Key is important. Presenting an
> accurate description of what happened is just as important. There is
> no need to cause widespread panic, yet. This is a shot across the
> proverbial bow.
Screw presenting an accurate description.
The test mode of the software indicates my machine will check about
80,000 keys/sec. In actuality, since I am running other programs as
I use it, it checks about 5,000 keys/sec.
Using my machine as an example of the average efficiency of all
the 1,000 machines, one could thus estimate that the crack could have
succeeded in about 90 days using one machine.
So why not put out a press report making this claim? Headline News
would probably snap it up!
The problem is that most people working to fight censorship and
oppression have this thing about wearing white hats and honesty and
all of that crap. Meanwhile, those working to censor and oppress
others to enhance their own power and finances are content to twist
the facts to fit their desires. And since they do have money and
power, their voice gets heard quite easily by the major media.
Thus the people in Waco died because of a "mistake" and the
people in OKC died because of a "monster."
Thus the Netscape problem was a "bug" that needs fixing instead
of a wake-up call that if the government is allowed to require
programmers to build surveillance capabilities into our software,
then unknown others are going to take advantage of those built-in
capabilities. And thus those who uncover the compromising of our
privacy will be called "blackmailers" and "terrorists" by the
very people who intentionally wrote their software to support
the Clipper chip, or GAK, or the Next Step in fascism.
Thus the DES crack was a monumental effort by a plethora of
computer gurus using a massive amount of computers, instead of
a mostly disorganized effort by a variety of people doing it as
an exercise in their spare time, and using the scraps from the
CPU tables of those participating.
"Everybody knows that the boat is sinking.
Everybody knows that the captain lied."
- Lou Reed
In the end, the media gets away with feeding us lies because
that is what we want to hear.
Everyone who wants to believe that they might wake up in the
morning with 800 law enforcement agents surrounding them because
of their religious beliefs, raise your hand.
Everyone who wants to believe that if they blindly go along
with all manner of injustice and justify it as "the way the
system works" that they need to fear personal reprisal, raise
your hand.
Everyone who wants to believe that every time you use your
computer over a phone line others can access your files, raise
your hand.
Everyone who wants to believe that the government is perfectly
willing to compromise the security and privacy of your financial
transactions in order to stifle crypto development that won't
allow them fascist control over all information, raise your
hand.
"Everybody knows that the war is over.
Everybody knows that the good guys lost."
- Lou Reed
I truly believe this, but it does not mean I won't continue
to work on the RC5 crack and continue to take small, halting
steps against the wind of middle-class fascism sweeping the
country. I will continue to do so because I also believe that
the end of any war is the beginning of the next revolution.
When Timothy McCypherpunk hacks a government hospital because
of weak security and because of weak encryption is able to
destroy their files, then I am sure that lives will be lost.
Even children's lives, perhaps.
I am equally certain that he/she will be called a "blackmailer"
and a "terrorist" and a "monster." Why? Because the word
"revolutionary" is too scary.
We can only have so many Waco's, just like we could only have
so many Kent State's, before people begin backing the "terrorists"
instead of the government.
Louis Riel, a Canadian Metis (French-Indian) was hung as a
terroist murderer, and now there are statues honoring him
and government buildings bearing his name.
We can hang Timothy McVeigh and Jim Bell and the Netscape
"blackmailer" but we can't guarantee that there won't be
a statue of them in the town square fifty years from now.
When the information counter-revolution comes, remember that
I started writing about it before Tim May began posting to
the hallowed cypherpunk archives. (a cheap shot, but a *good*
one, eh?)
http://bureau42.base.org/public/xenix
http://bureau42.base.org/public/webworld
RC5CrackHead
NODE cd834eccRe: Garbled in transmission.
C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com>Tue, 24 Jun 1997 21:33:09 +0800
>>>>> "Rick" == Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com> writes:
>> I can't remember it word for word, but it went like this: "If
>> you're going to decrypt financial transactions you'd better be
>> prepared to get 1000 computers and spend 3 months on the project."
Rick> At least Harry Houdini made it look easy when *he* cracked state
Rick> of the art security technology...
I was on the Talk America radio network very briefly Monday morning
(about 6:30-6:40 EDT). The host read something like that, and
observed that it "must be pretty secure" to take three months.
I asked him how long it would be before his credit cards expired.
He got the point.
--
Matt Curtin Chief Scientist Megasoft Online cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com
http://www.research.megasoft.com/people/cmcurtin/ I speak only for myself
Pull AGIS.NET's plug! DES has fallen! http://www.frii.com/~rcv/deschall.htm