NODE 862eed77PICS recipes
nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:09:41 +0800
Dimitri the KOTM has asked how to rate one's Web site as being very "nasty".
Add the following META tags between the <HEAD> and </HEAD> tags:
<HEAD>
...
<META NAME="rating" CONTENT="adults only"><META HTTP-EQUIV="PICS-Label"
CONTENT='(PICS-1.1 "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l r (n 4 s 4 v 4 l 4)
"http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" l r (SS~~000 9 SS~~001 9 SS~~002 9 SS~~003
9 SS~~004 9 SS~~005 9 SS~~006 9 SS~~007 9 SS~~008 9 SS~~009 9 SS~~00A 9)
"http://www.weburbia.com/safe/ratings.htm" l r (s 2)
"http://vancouver-webpages.com/VWP1.0/" l r (P 4 S 7 SF 2 V 5 Tol 4 Com 3 Env
2 MC 2 Gam 3 Can 0 Edu 1 ))'>
...
</HEAD>
(The stuff between the single quotes ' ' should probably be all on one line!)
Add the following RFC822-style header to your e-mail and Usenet articles:
PICS-Label: (PICS-1.1 "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l r (n 4 s 4 v 4 l
4) "http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" l r (SS~~000 9 SS~~001 9 SS~~002 9
SS~~003 9 SS~~004 9 SS~~005 9 SS~~006 9 SS~~007 9 SS~~008 9 SS~~009 9 SS~~00A
9) "http://www.weburbia.com/safe/ratings.htm" l r (s 2)
"http://vancouver-webpages.com/VWP1.0/" l r (P 4 S 7 SF 2 V 5 Tol 4 Com 3 Env
2 MC 2 Gam 3 Can 0 Edu 1 ))
/\ /\
((ovo)) RatingsMonger
():::()
VVV
NODE eb62d46dRe: Voluntary mandatory PICS ratings on all posts
Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>Mon, 21 Jul 1997 14:51:58 +0800
At 10:22 AM 7/19/97 -0700, Tim wrote:
...
>Voluntary Mandatory Self-Rating of this Article
>(U.S. Statute 43-666-970719).
Hmmm - somehow my browser let this through
>**SUMMARY**
>Estimated number of readers qualified to read this: 1
>Composite Age Rating: 45 years
I thought you were still 44? Happy Birthday!
:-)
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
# (If this is a mailing list or news, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)
NODE 4962eb9cVoluntary mandatory PICS ratings on all posts
Tim May <tcmay@got.net>Sun, 20 Jul 1997 01:24:52 +0800
At 9:03 AM -0700 7/19/97, Anonymous wrote:
>Dimitri the KOTM has asked how to rate one's Web site as being very "nasty".
>
>
>Add the following META tags between the <HEAD> and </HEAD> tags:
>
><HEAD>
>...
><META NAME="rating" CONTENT="adults only"><META HTTP-EQUIV="PICS-Label"
>CONTENT='(PICS-1.1 "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l r (n 4 s 4 v 4 l 4)
>"http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" l r (SS~~000 9 SS~~001 9 SS~~002 9 SS~~003
...
I've been using the _text_ form, as the Children's Decency and Safety Act
of 1997 requires that _all_ electronic communications potentially viewable
by those affected (children, the mentally disable, homos, Muslims, etc.,
any of whom might be offended) be appropriately rated and labelled with the
voluntary self-rating system (can be found at
http://www.bigbro.gov/ratingsv01.html).
This mandatory voluntary system meets the needs of us all. Ignorance is
freedom, voluntary means mandatory.
I have come to love Big Brother!
--Winston
Voluntary Mandatory Self-Rating of this Article
(U.S. Statute 43-666-970719).
Warning: Failure to Correctly and Completely Label any Article or Utterance
is a Felony under the "Children's Internet Safety Act of 1997," punishable
by 6 months for the first offense, two years for each additional offense,
and a $100,000 fine per offense. Reminder: The PICS/RSACi label must itself
not contain material in violation of the Act.
** PICS/RSACi Voluntary Self-Rating (Text Form) ** :
Suitable for Children: yes Age Rating: 5 years and up.
Suitable for Christians: No Suitable for Moslems: No Hindus: Yes
Pacifists: No Government Officials: No Nihilists: Yes Anarchists: Yes
Vegetarians: Yes Vegans: No Homosexuals: No Atheists: Yes
Caucasoids: Yes Negroids: No Mongoloids: Yes
Bipolar Disorder: No MPD: Yes and No Attention Deficit Disorder:Huh?
--Contains discussions of sexuality, rebellion, anarchy, chaos,torture,
regicide, presicide, suicide, aptical foddering.
--Contains references hurtful to persons of poundage and people of
color.Sensitive persons are advised to skip this article.
**SUMMARY**
Estimated number of readers qualified to read this: 1
Composite Age Rating: 45 years
NODE 4952808aRe: PICS recipes
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Sun, 20 Jul 1997 09:53:39 +0800
nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) writes:
>
> Dimitri the KOTM has asked how to rate one's Web site as being very "nasty".
Thanks!!
> "http://vancouver-webpages.com/VWP1.0/" l r (P 4 S 7 SF 2 V 5 Tol 4 Com 3 Env
> 2 MC 2 Gam 3 Can 0 Edu 1 ))'>
I find this one the funniest. It means, the page makes disparaging remarks
about the environment and has no Canadian content.
> /\ /\
> ((ovo)) RatingsMonger
> ():::()
> VVV
I suppose for good measure one could add
<meta name="keywords" content="shit, fuck, piss, cunt, socksucker...">
among the headers.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps