NODE 60c69762NSA cracker - how many TW
Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 04:31:33 +0800
iang@cs.berkeley.edu
> seems also unlikely. (Actually, for all I know, terawatt power sources
> may exist; that's out of my field. Please let me know if this is the case.
> I just know that at my rates, 7.12 TW for 33 minutes (at about $.10/kWh)
I've extracted some figures from an industry publication
and arrive at a worldwide electricity generation capacity
of 1.6 TW. Assuming that 1% of that power is smuggled into
the deep space cracker we're not even close to 33 minutes,
and it doesn't matter whether we're looking at a one-off
every so often rather than a continuous 40 a day.
And that's still on optimistic assumptions including
1) testing keys for free
2a) running on earth at 3 K rather than 300 K
or
2b) no bother transmitting power & signals into space
(Like if the cracker had been secretly installed on Voyager 2
that'd be your 33 mins gone waiting for the radio.)
IBM have published a communications scheme that claims to recover
energy normally lost - it was on their website a few months ago.
I skipped reading it at the time because it sounded dotty.
NODE cdc72079Re: NSA cracker - how many TW
Harry Tuttle Remailer <h_tuttle@rigel.cyberpass.net>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 09:33:45 +0800
On Mon, Jul 28, 1997 at 07:31:01PM -0000, Secret Squirrel wrote:
> IBM have published a communications scheme that claims to recover
> energy normally lost - it was on their website a few months ago.
> I skipped reading it at the time because it sounded dotty.
A few years ago an engineer at one of the weapons labs found
a new solution to Maxwells equations. This was briefly
reported in the general press, and seemed to imply that the
solutions found allowed for soliton-like wave packets.
Some time later there were experiments reported using water
tanks with specially shaped wave generators that were trying
to create a water-wave analog. The article describing these
experiments speculated, if I remember correctly, that
special antenna geometry and manipulation of the input
signal might be used to generate a electromagnetic wave
equivalent. There was also brief speculation about uses for
such a device -- beamed energy packets, for communications,
or, at high power, for energy transfer. Or weapons.
Anyone else remember this?