// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Marc Andreessen on encryption and CDA

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE fc3fa560Re: Marc Andreessen on encryption and CDA
I suppose that's why US displays the greatest income disparity between rich
and poor of
any of the industrialized nations?   Why some 10 or 20 billionaires
collectively own more
wealth than some 20% of the world's population? Or were you being sarcastic?

At 07:58 PM 6/30/97 -0700, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>Ah, but what is a market except voluntary transactions between people?
>What is good for the market is good for the people.
>
>-Declan
>
>On Mon, 30 Jun 1997 geeman@best.com wrote:
>
>> My biggest problem is when the pundits (and by extension, those that punt
>> to them)
>> frame this entire debate in terms of the Market.  To do so is to argue that
>> only solutions
>> that are good for The Market are good solutions; that when a particular
>> policy is market-agnostic
>> or market-negative, even though it may be good policy for People (yes,
>> remember them ???) it is irrelevant or
>> bad.  This debate is NOT about the Worldwide Encryption Market!
>> 
>
>
>
NODE ff1d9fc8Re: Marc Andreessen on encryption and CDA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 08:49 AM 7/1/97 -0700, geeman@best.com wrote:
>I suppose that's why US displays the greatest income disparity between rich
>and poor of
>any of the industrialized nations?   

We don't know if this is true because no statistical series captures all 
"wealth."  The underground economy here is supposedly 15% but higher in much 
of Europe.  Also no country includes public benefits in income calculations 
although they are income and the higher US medical costs substantially 
increase the total income of those receiving Medicaid.  Those comparisons are 
suspect because too much income is excluded from the calcs.

>Why some 10 or 20 billionaires
>collectively own more
>wealth than some 20% of the world's population? Or were you being sarcastic?

They don't.  They own more "securities."  If you total the discounted 
(present) value of the future income stream of 20% of the earth's population 
(adjusting for the probable massive income increases of the next 20 years of 
extreme boom times), and you count the value of personal property it comes to 
more than the current wealth of the top billionaires who after all are 
apparently worth less than a $trillion or two collectively.

But I don't know what this all has to do with encryption policy, however.

DCF 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM7lAc4VO4r4sgSPhAQEkSQP/Rs+XzPrzUQptgBWK+LLb+vmAMPcaBHWE
Ww1PsYGqwo4W0Mlse0ynCGZfZdiIx+tlDbWbqYtvisNqeIYK8Qcn8K7b63ytZ1aN
OPM/DshwQ0bpgQMoTXpMwGnZmB9e4/LGriZXMSmk+fkZvO2flmVuUMj+Vao+Bs+N
xLZKAHYvXWw=
=F09z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----