None

>It's actually closer to a cult -- a small group with it's own shared
>reality -- a reality quite at variance with societal norms.  The cult
>has its own terminology, and an underlying dogma to which these code
>words refer.  The cult has "special knowledge" that has been revealed
>to them concerning massive changes that will happen to society --
>changes that will usher in a new world order.  These changes may 
>involve the world going through a cleansing fire of war of war and 
>destruction. 

Ahhh, look, the spook speaks.

>Certain of the members sport a messiah or a martyr complex.  It is 
>also quite common for cults to call for arming the brethren against 
>the coming struggle -- even the Heaven's Gate group apparently had 
>stashes of weapons.
>
>It's all so predictable.

I would just like to say this:

Kent is a shill.

Let me say it again:

Kent is a shill.

He's so predictable.

On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Anonymous wrote:

> >It's actually closer to a cult -- a small group with it's own shared
> >reality -- a reality quite at variance with societal norms. 

[...]

> Ahhh, look, the spook speaks.

Never the less the spook has a good point.  We must never let ourselfs get
into a form of group thing or let ourselfs get blinded by ideology.



Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. Buy easter bilbies.
Save the ABC Is $0.08 per day too much to pay?   ex-net.scum and proud
I'm sorry but I just don't consider 'because its yucky' a convincing argument