NODE f2decd7eHypothetical situation for networks
Mike Jones <Mkljones@cris.com>Thu, 14 Aug 1997 10:08:04 +0800
This is a 100% hypothetical situation, though would be interesting to see
if it is possible.
A company does some R&D work, which it wishes to keep classified from
competitors.
However, they have two main offices on opposite sides of the country.
Not wishing to use sneakernet type file transfer, they wish to pass
confidential material from one network to the other using the Internet.
Now we all know that anyone with a little bit of knowledge can intercept
the packets as they go past and read the information.
Email is out, as they do use a system of file mirroring, keeping each set
of data as a backup as well as for usage.
Would make sense for them to use a type of NFS system, but is there an
implimentation of secure (ie: encrypted) NFS available?
OS doesn't really matter, as it is a hypothetical system, but we'll assume
either some form of unix/linux, or perhaps winNT or novell NetWare.
Thanks in advance for the info and knowledge...sorry if it's been asked
before.
--
Mike Jones -- CNA, CNE, pursueing MCNE and MCSE currently.
email: Mkljones@cris.com
Finger Mkljones@cris.com for Geek code and PGP key
"They cannot scare me with their empty spaces
Between stars--on stars where no human race is
I have it in me so much nearer home
To scare myself with my own desert places."
NODE eafad036Re: Hypothetical situation for networks
Matthew Ghio <ghio@temp0110.myriad.ml.org>Fri, 15 Aug 1997 01:48:43 +0800
Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com> wrote:
> Can NFS under solaris or linux be tunneled through SSH? That would seem
> feasable (that is if you can get SSH to tunnel a UDP...)
Yes, you can tunnel SLIP/PPP thru SSH. (Works on Linux, don't know about
solaris.)
NODE 0a034e44Re: Hypothetical situation for networks
"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:55:27 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <Pine.SUN.3.96.970813213346.8665A-100000@mariner.cris.com>, on 08/13/97
at 09:39 PM, Mike Jones <Mkljones@cris.com> said:
>This is a 100% hypothetical situation, though would be interesting to see
>if it is possible.
>A company does some R&D work, which it wishes to keep classified from
>competitors.
>However, they have two main offices on opposite sides of the country.
>Not wishing to use sneakernet type file transfer, they wish to pass
>confidential material from one network to the other using the Internet.
>Now we all know that anyone with a little bit of knowledge can intercept
>the packets as they go past and read the information.
>Email is out, as they do use a system of file mirroring, keeping each set
>of data as a backup as well as for usage.
>Would make sense for them to use a type of NFS system, but is there an
>implimentation of secure (ie: encrypted) NFS available?
>OS doesn't really matter, as it is a hypothetical system, but we'll
>assume either some form of unix/linux, or perhaps winNT or novell
>NetWare.
>Thanks in advance for the info and knowledge...sorry if it's been asked
>before.
Redirect all your socket connections through ssh. That way all your
communications between the two offices will be encrypted.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBM/J/T49Co1n+aLhhAQFRLQQAm8iDbnsS1Rp//LiskXr/B9e5O7EcqSvt
MRBotK9KeHET8qGDqexzt/U5OPH+gDVO3qAp5RZ/gl6LSRTTZON/gBheOeaVJIcl
QqbDPshblGpibaxa9zUNADii6tlSwhp2qwV8hXuUsMZcYHOWu5CSzs3aVzbV2pDq
+uAC20JyQpg=
=XSLK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE eef57a24Re: Hypothetical situation for networks
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Thu, 14 Aug 1997 21:43:07 +0800
Mike Jones <Mkljones@cris.com> writes:
> A company does some R&D work, which it wishes to keep classified from
> competitors.
...
> Not wishing to use sneakernet type file transfer, they wish to pass
> confidential material from one network to the other using the Internet.
They should not be using the Internet not (only) because of security
considerations, but because of performance/reliability/availability
considerations.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
NODE c9f00705Re: Hypothetical situation for networks
Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>Thu, 14 Aug 1997 23:50:54 +0800
On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Mike Jones wrote:
> Would make sense for them to use a type of NFS system, but is there an
> implimentation of secure (ie: encrypted) NFS available?
>
> OS doesn't really matter, as it is a hypothetical system, but we'll assume
> either some form of unix/linux, or perhaps winNT or novell NetWare.
Can NFS under solaris or linux be tunneled through SSH? That would seem
feasable (that is if you can get SSH to tunnel a UDP...) If not, you
could use microsoft's PPTP, but I wouldn't trust its cyphers.
=====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos==============
.+.^.+.| Ray Arachelian |Prying open my 3rd eye. So good to see |./|\.
..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|you once again. I thought you were |/\|/\
<--*-->| ------------------ |hiding, and you thought that I had run |\/|\/
../|\..| "A toast to Odin, |away chasing the tail of dogma. I opened|.\|/.
.+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|my eye and there we were.... |.....
======================= http://www.sundernet.com ==========================
NODE a0dd0a71Re: Hypothetical situation for networks
nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)Fri, 15 Aug 1997 07:29:50 +0800
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> > OS doesn't really matter, as it is a hypothetical system, but we'll assume
> > either some form of unix/linux, or perhaps winNT or novell NetWare.
>
> Can NFS under solaris or linux be tunneled through SSH? That would seem
> feasable (that is if you can get SSH to tunnel a UDP...)
I think SSH will not tunnel UDP, and TCP NFS for Linux and Solaris (?) is
not reliable. I would lean towards SSH in rcp-style mode: for a
continent-wide link you will probably find the performance of batch-style
transfers more enjoyable than that of a remote file system system. SSH
also very neatly lets you run remote commands and so on. (Enough,
already...)
> If not, you
> could use microsoft's PPTP, but I wouldn't trust its cyphers.
Don't touch it.
::Boots
NODE 7da36795Re: Hypothetical situation for networks
? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>Fri, 15 Aug 1997 07:47:32 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Mike Jones wrote:
>
> > OS doesn't really matter, as it is a hypothetical system, but we'll assume
> > either some form of unix/linux, or perhaps winNT or novell NetWare.
>
> Can NFS under solaris or linux be tunneled through SSH? That would seem
> feasable (that is if you can get SSH to tunnel a UDP...)
If thay are useing NFS over a lan I would hope thay are useing the TCP
verson. While UDP is fine on a Lan you realy need the (reletive)
reliblity that comes with TCP.
In fact if you want any reliblity you sould by your own line. The
Internet is just two unrealible.
- --
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM/NbTaQK0ynCmdStAQG0mwQAw2d5J8pyAz93CVRjoN8c+FziznMSKmMW
CCHKmLhOSHlqosem4Uas9kXZhMuqKG2ZZ8GZ/aXZL1zUtF9mX+jDxmBx3ohUEaDD
u3OIJ84DSKEA3AQjsKp03FUo1j5/0unsbnPjks2iYRuO157FaFC5YYkx1gxqfbiI
hyTKm7gLDts=
=Nq6K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----