// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE af6626dfRe: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE
I'm all for the year... get more people
using crypto everyday...
We 'gotta make it popular and the 'thing to do'...
We need a Captain Marvel Secret Decoder Ring...
"Hey Kids, send a secret message to your buddies..."

At this point... after what's happened so far..
I'm in favor of a Clinton veto...
NO crypto laws at all...

LarryM.
NODE 017cfd0bRe: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE
On Thu, 25 Sep 1997 Syniker@aol.com wrote:

> At this point... after what's happened so far..
> I'm in favor of a Clinton veto...
> NO crypto laws at all...

What Congress can grant, they can take away. I'm not sure if I like the
SAFE language that "grants" me the right to use whatever encryption device
I like at whatever strength I like. 

You see... I thought that was an inalienable right that Congress can't
grant, let alone take back.

No pro-crypto legislation will survive a Clinton veto. I challenge those
who disagree to post a contrary scenario.

-Declan
NODE f416a4a2Re: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE
At 7:17 PM -0700 9/25/97, Syniker@aol.com wrote:
>I'm all for the year... get more people
>using crypto everyday...

This is why holding actions help. Confusing Congress enough to delay taking
up encryption bans may eventually win the war, if in the time between
enough people begin to use and understand encryption that politicians see a
downside in upsetting that many voters by deleting their privacy.

I believe the same factors worked for us in the recent CDA/net-censorship
battles.

--
"I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you recover your keys."